Question

Andrew agrees to paint Rosalene's house for $500. Two days after he starts the job, he decides that $500 isn't enough money. He refuses to finish the job, unless Rosalene agrees to pay him $100 more. What legal principle applies to this fact situation?
A. The acceptance of additional money to settle a disputed claim is supported by consideration.
B. A past obligation is sufficient consideration for a new promise.
C. Andrew was already obligated to paint the house. He gives no additional consideration in return for Rosalene's promise to pay more money.
D. Rosalene has made a promise in exchange for a forbearance.

Answer 1

Answer:

C. Andrew was already obligated to paint the house. He gives no additional consideration in return for Rosalene's promise to pay more money.

Explanation:

In this scenario Andrew had already agreed to do the painting for $500, so he is obligated to do the job or breach the contract.

He does not have a legal backing to make a counter deal in the middle of the job.

If Roseline decides to pay an extra $100 she does so without any obligations. She may or may not pay and Andrew is still obligated to complete the work.