Answer:
5.4 years
Explanation:
Future value is the value of the calculated by compounding a specific present value using a specific discount rate
Payment = $1,500
Rate = 9.56%
Future value = $10,000
We will use the following formula to calculate the numbers of years.
Future Value = Payment x [ ( 1 + r)^n - 1 / r ]
$10,000 = $1,500 x [ ( 1 + 9.56%)^n - 1 / 9.56%
$10,000 x 9.56% / 1,500 = ( 1 + 9.56%)^n - 1
0.6373 +1 = 1.0956^n
1.6373 = 1.0956^n
Log 1.6373 = n log 1.0956
n = log 1.0956 / Log 1.6373
n = 5.4 years
<span>Answer:
Gross Pay: $1200
Less Health Ins: (42.50)
Taxable Pay: 1157.50
SS Tax: 71.77 (1157.50 *.062)
Medicare Tax: 16.78 (1157.50 *.0145)
FIT: 91.79
Net Pay: 977.17
FIT calcualted as follows: Taxable less allowances (1157.50 less (71.15*4) = 872.9
(872.9 * .15)-39.15 = 91.79</span>
Answer: hello your question is poorly structured attached below is the missing graph and missing part of the question
Assume the government imposes a $1.00 excise tax on the sale of every 2 liter bottle of soda. The tax is to be paid by the producers of soda. The figure below shows the annual market for 2 liter bottles of soda before and after the tax is imposed.
answer :
a) $2 , 4 billion
b) $2.5
c) $1.5
d) 3 billion
e) $3 billion
Explanation:
a) equilibrium price = $2 per bottle
equilibrium quantity = 4 billion bottles
<u>b) After imposition of excise tax </u>
consumers will pay = $2.5
<u>c) The amount producers keep after the imposition of taxes </u>
= $2.5 - tax
= 2.5 - 1 = $1.5
<u>d) New equilibrium quantity ( after tax is imposed ) </u>
= 3 billion bottles ( from graph attached ) i.e. intersection of S2 and D
e)<u> Amount of tax revenue collected by the government from the imposition of tax </u>
= quantity of bottles sold * $1
= 3 billion * $1 = $3 billion
Answer:
The correct option is C (marginal revenue is less than $9)
Explanation:
If the price of a commodity is lowered because you have some kind of monopoly over the industry, this shows that the marginal revenue is lower than the new selling price. This is simply because marginal revenue is that revenue gained when you produce one more unit of a product, and hence there is no way that this value would be greater than the new selling price. You would be selling at a loss if you do so.
<span>The statement is
false. The double taxation should not be a problem if it occurs because
households pay taxes on dividends and capital gains from stock and corporations
pay taxes on corporate profits. It is a normal process the government performs
when there is the passing of various tax laws.</span>
