We can calculate the
cost of goods manufactures using the formula:
Total Cost = Cost of
Direct Materials + Direct Labor Cost + Overhead Cost – Inventory
Substituting the known
values:
<span>Total Cost = $35,000 + $73,000 + $114,000 – ($32,000 - $28,000)</span>
Total
Cost = $218,000 -----> ANSWERWe
deduct the initial from the final inventory to get the balance.
<span> </span>
Industrialized former colonial states that dominate the world economic system: Core Countries
Answer:
The average expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 10 percent.
Explanation:
The CAPM (fixed asset pricing) model describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return on assets, especially stocks. CAPM is widely used throughout the financial community to value high-risk securities and achieve the expected returns on assets when taking into account the risk of those assets and the cost of capital.
The formula for calculating the expected return on an asset taking into account its risk is as follows:
ERi = Rf + βi (ERm - Rf)
where:
ERi = expected return on investment
Rf = risk-free interest rate = 4 percent.
βi = beta inversion =1.0
(ERm −Rf) = market risk premium = 6 percent.
ERi = 4 + 1 ×(6) =10
The average expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 10 percent.
A. Personal
Personal accountant: A person who has the requisite skill and experience in establishing and maintaining accurate financial records for an individual or a business.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
