Answer:
I believe the answer is Cuba
Explanation:
US government-funded Freedom House classifies Cuba as being "Not Free", and notes that "Cuba is the only country in the Americas that consistently makes Freedom House's list of the Worst of the Worst: the World's Most Repressive Societies for widespread abuses of political rights and civil liberties."
Answer:D
Explanation: The brain the central control in the nervous system
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Please make me a brainly!
I hope this helps you later!
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Define con tus propias palabras quienes son beneficiarios directos
y beneficiarios indirectos de un emprendimiento.
Los beneficiarios directos del emprendimiento son las personas que se ven beneficiadas por la apertura de la empresa o del negocio, y que son contratadas para trabajar en esa empresa o negocio.
Los empresarios o inversionistas apoyan la economía local cuando abren un negocio y crean nuevos empleos que benefician a las personas.
De igual manera, el beneficio es para los consumidores de ese nuevo producto o servicio que se oferta con la apertura de este negocio. Estos consumidores se benefician por la apertura de este negocio.
De manera indirecta, el beneficio es para los proveedores, distribuidores y otras personas que son parte de la cadena de fabricación-producción-entrega del producto, que no tendrían oportunidad de generar un ingreso si no se hubiera creado esta nueva empresa gracias al entusiasmo de los emprendedores.
Answer:
a. Long Cycle Theory
Explanation:
In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.
The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.