The type of conflict that Kevin is facing based on the scenario that has being painted here is what is called the Conflict of loyalty. Option B.
<h3>What does it mean to be in conflict?</h3>
A mental conflict brought on by conflicting or incompatible wants, urges, wishes, or demands from the outside or the inside.
Conflict-affected individuals may come out as tense and uneasy. For instance, they could shun social situations and question everything they do all the time. Words and comments - How workers communicate verbally might show whether conflict is present. People tend to use far more emotional language when they are agitated.
When a person has a duty of loyalty to many entities and those entities' interests disagree, there is a conflict of loyalty.
When a board member may be swayed by factors other than what is best for the organization, there is a possible conflict of loyalties. Loyalty conflicts could be severe enough to qualify as interest conflicts.
Read more on conflict here:brainly.com/question/846617
#SPJ1
Answer:
10.60%
Explanation:
First, we calcualte the returns and then solve for the rate like a normal compounding:
<u>returns:</u>
annual coupon payment. 1,000 face value x $ 13.68 = $ 136.80
sales price: 913.73
<u>total:</u> 136.8 x 6 + 913.73 = 820.80 + 913.73 =
<em />
<u>cost: </u> 947.68
to record the effective rate of return:
![947.64 (1+ r_e)^6 = 1,734.5\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=947.64%20%281%2B%20r_e%29%5E6%20%3D%201%2C734.5%5C%5C)
![\sqrt[6]{\frac{1,734.5}{947.68}} -1 = r_e](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B6%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%2C734.5%7D%7B947.68%7D%7D%20-1%20%3D%20r_e)
<u>effective rate of return:</u> 0.105992287 = 10.60%
Answer:
Could you be more clear!?
Explanation:
Answer:
Therefore after 16.26 unit of time, both accounts have same balance.
The both account have $8,834.43.
Explanation:
Formula for continuous compounding :
![P(t)=P_0e^{rt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3DP_0e%5E%7Brt%7D)
P(t)= value after t time
= Initial principal
r= rate of interest annually
t=length of time.
Given that, someone invested $5,000 at an interest 3.5% and another one invested $5,250 at an interest 3.2% .
Let after t year the both accounts have same balance.
For the first case,
P= $5,000, r=3.5%=0.035
![P(t)=5000e^{0.035t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3D5000e%5E%7B0.035t%7D)
For the second case,
P= $5,250, r=3.5%=0.032
![P(t)=5250e^{0.032t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3D5250e%5E%7B0.032t%7D)
According to the problem,
![5000e^{0.035t}=5250e^{0.032t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=5000e%5E%7B0.035t%7D%3D5250e%5E%7B0.032t%7D)
![\Rightarrow \frac{e^{0.035t}}{e^{0.032t}}=\frac{5250}{5000}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7B0.035t%7D%7D%7Be%5E%7B0.032t%7D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B5250%7D%7B5000%7D)
![\Rightarrow e^{0.035t-0.032t}=\frac{21}{20}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20e%5E%7B0.035t-0.032t%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B20%7D)
![\Rightarrow e^{0.003t}=\frac{21}{20}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20e%5E%7B0.003t%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B20%7D)
Taking ln both sides
![\Rightarrow lne^{0.003t}=ln(\frac{21}{20})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20lne%5E%7B0.003t%7D%3Dln%28%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B20%7D%29)
![\Rightarrow 0.003t}=ln(\frac{21}{20})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%200.003t%7D%3Dln%28%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B20%7D%29)
![\Rightarrow t}=\frac{ln(\frac{21}{20})}{0.003}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CRightarrow%20t%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7Bln%28%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B20%7D%29%7D%7B0.003%7D)
Therefore after 16.26 unit of time, both accounts have same balance.
The account balance on that time is
![P(16.26)=5000e^{0.035\times 16.26}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%2816.26%29%3D5000e%5E%7B0.035%5Ctimes%2016.26%7D)
=$8,834.43
The both account have $8,834.43.
Answer:
- Cheaper labor.
- Cheaper auto parts.
Explanation:
China has cheaper labor rates than the United States in comparative industries including in the motor vehicle producing industry. Ford may want to take advantage of this to make cars at a smaller cost in China and therefore make more profit in sales.
Car parts are also easier and cheaper to acquire in China. Steel for instance, is a very valuable commodity in motor vehicle manufacturing and China happens to be the largest producer in the world. Having access to cheaper materials would increase Ford's profitability as well.