Answer: Eloise is PERPETUATING THE STATUS QUO.
Explanation: Perpetuating the status quo simply means prolonging the way things are, as opposed to the way they could be. For example, a manager failing to explore new methods and ideas probably because they feel the current status is working well.
Eloise knee very well all other stores that have started selling organic products, accepting smartphone payments have recorded significant profits increase but she is just "fine" the way she is. This is an example of Perpetuating the status quo.
The major breakthrough in the study of dreams came in 1953 when researchers Eugene Aserinsky and Nathaniel Kleitman studied and discovered what happens when a person falls asleep.They found that the body enters into a psycho-physiological state in intervals of 90 minute cycles during sleep. This physiological state consists of heightened brain activity, Rapid Eye Movement (REM), increased breathing, a temporary paralysis of the body and genital engorgement. Through experiments, they confirmed that these physiological observations were the result of the person being in the dream state.
Answer of question 6:
The mark seen on the picture is called: crescendo.
Explanation:
It is an Italian term mark that means gradually getting louder.
As we can notice a crescendo (abbreviated as <em>cresc.</em>) is a horizontal mark with an opening angle (like so: <). It can be followed by another dynamics command.
In order to answer the question 7, the piece is needed.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Hi. I am not sure if those written after the statement are the choices. Just in case they are the choices, let me go ahead and answer this one for you. The economy of Australia is characterized by prosperity. They have a mixed market economy. It is home to some of the largest companies in the world.
The answer would be: prosperity
