An argumentative speech is a persuasive speech in which the speaker attempts to persuade his audience to alter their viewpoints on a controversial issue. ... Argumentative speeches generally concern topics which are currently being debated by society, current controversial issues.
Jim chose Bill and Terry for his team Sandra chose Gina and Mary Luke chose Audrey and Reggie.
The answer would be Person Vs Person because the fishermans wife just wanted more and more from him not thinking about him at all just herself...and there was no other charater in the story but the fish, but the fish was giving the man gifts so he wouldn't be the problem so the wife was the conflict in the story that's why it would be Husband Vs Wife.
I hoped this helped!
Have a great day/night! :)
Let's write complete sentences using the given words:
1. Van Gogh's paintings are almost as expensive as the work of Picasso.
2. We did not know the Recycled Orchestra until we watched the video online yesterday.
For the first sentence, we can see that the purpose is to compare the work of two painters, Van Gogh and Picasso. That is why we use the structure "as ... as". We must place the adjective "expensive" in the middle: "almost as expensive as".
For the second sentence, we do not need to add anything. However, because of the word "yesterday", we know the sentence refers to something that happened in the past. Thus, we use the Simple Past tense for the verbs: not know - did not know; watch - watched.
In conclusion, all we need to do is read the words to grasp what the purpose of each sentence is and then add or change whatever is necessary to form a complete sentence.
Learn more about the Simple Past tense here:
brainly.com/question/14025107?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
1. prossess of metimorphis
2.egg laying location
3.catipillar hatching/ first meal
4.proccess of moulting
5.metimorphis of catipillar to butterfly
6.butterflys first moments
7.sad reality of a butterflys existiance
IF THIS HELPED PLS REMEMBER TO BRAINLIEST ME
