Answer:
the long-run framework directs one to avoid deficits; in the short-run framework deficits are useful if the economy is significantly below potential.
Explanation:
"Budget deficits should be avoided, even if the economy is below potential, because they reduce saving and lead to lower growth." This policy directive follow the long-run framework directs one to avoid deficits; in the short-run framework deficits are useful if the economy is significantly below potential.
<u>The reason is that in the short-run, deficits offer economic solutions by being an antidote to recessions, hence they could be a strategy of recession management in the short run</u>
<u>However in the long-run, deficits are not advisable as they could lead to debts because the major way to manage such deficits is by external borrowings. </u>
<u />
Answer: $3,564.50
Explanation:
The total amount that the company will pay for the merchandise is the net cost of the merchandise, less a 3% cash discount, plus the transportation costs. The cash discount normally only applies to the merchandise and not the transportation costs.
The cost of the merchandise is $3,600 less the $250 refund, which equals $3,350. With a 3% cash discount they will pay 97% of this amount, which is $3,249.50. After adding the additional transportation charge of $315, the total amount to be paid is $3,564.50.
There are different kinds of trade. Trading in foreign currency options would most likely be an appropriate hedging tool for individual investors who want to hedge the risk on specific U.S. exchange-listed stocks.
<h3>Currency option hedges</h3>
- Currency option hedges are known to be tools that are used in international business.
An example, when an American importer is said to agree to buy some food equipment from a Chinese manufacturer at a later future date. The transaction will be carried out in Chinese currency.
The American importer has therefore made an hedge by buing currency options on the Chinese currency.
Learn more about trade from
brainly.com/question/4957225
Answer:
the correct answer is a. more difficult than
Explanation:
Unlike Transaction exposure, economic exposure is difficult to predict and difficult to mitigate in an event of occurence, thus making it harder to manage than transaction exposure.
This is mainly because economic exposure can happen due to various macro economic factors and international political incidents.
