Answer:
(C) The Firm's stock is overvalued and one should consider selling the stock
Explanation:
Price Earnings Ratio is a measure of market price of stock in relation to it's earnings. It shows how well a company's stock is valued in the market.
Price Earnings Ratio = ![\frac{Market\ Price\ Per\ Share}{Earnings\ Per\ Share}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BMarket%5C%20Price%5C%20Per%5C%20Share%7D%7BEarnings%5C%20Per%5C%20Share%7D)
A high price earnings ratio would lead investors to believe that the firm's stock prices are higher than it's earnings which means the stock prices are overvalued.
This further means, the market price of those stocks is greater than their fair value and it would be beneficial to investors to sell such stocks as it would result into a gain.
Thus, a higher price earnings ratio will lead investors to infer that the firm's stock is overvalued and one should consider selling the stock.
The steps in the planning process of an organization include:
- A. Formulating strategies to achieve the goals.
- B. Determining the organization's mission and goals.
- D. Selecting the most effective way to implement the organizational strategy.
<h3>What is planning?</h3>
Planning is a management function that ensures the achievement of organizational efficiency and effectiveness.
Planning usually takes place at three levels of the organization, including:
- Functional
- Business
- Corporate levels.
Thus, the steps in the planning process of an organization include Options A, B, and D.
Learn more about the planning function at brainly.com/question/3504046
#SPJ12
Answer:
Total sum at te end of 6 years=$ 73,138.97
Explanation:
<em>The total sum in Lee's account at the end of year would be determined as follows:</em>
FV= A × (1+r)^n
FV- Future sum?,
A- deposit amount ,
r- interest rate - 9%/2 = 4.5% per 6 months
n- number of years is 6
First deposit for 6 years
FV = 15,000× 1.045^(2×6)
= $25,438.22
Last 40,000 for 2 years
FV = 40,000 1.045^(2×2)
=47,700.74403
Total sum at the end of 6 years
= $25,438.22 + $47,700.74
=$ 73,138.97
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option A) satisfy a requirement in addressing a risk .
Explanation:
The reason why management is implementing controls is to mitigate the risk in the newly developed system, that is why management should select that control which primarily mitigate the risk, which have been identified by the management. While designing a control, it would be necessary to consider all the aspects given in the question for a control to be best but in reality it might not be possible.
Answer:
The answer is: C) lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In order for Larson to be able to rescind the contract, he would have to prove that he had reasonable reliance that Robert Redford owned that specific car. Reasonable reliance refers to a person believing something to be a fact, which any other person could reasonably believe in as well.
But exactly how could he prove that someone else might also believe that the car was previously owned by Robert Redford? I find it very doubtful that he can prove that.