Answer:
D. Will the Jury award be worth it?
Explanation:
Jones asking himself if whistle blowing is the only way to stop unethical behavior and wrong doing before making decision whether or not to whistleblow is important, as if there are alternative measures to be taken that would mitigate those actions, it might be better to take those alternatives.
Same thing with whether he has documentary evidence to back up his accusatory statements and the reason for whistleblowing.
But the one thing that shouldn't have bearing on his decision is if the Jury award would be worth it. Whether or not there's an award for whistleblowing shouldn't be the determinant or driving factor that decides whether or not he should whistleblow. Its unethical to consider the monetary aspect or award gotten from whistleblowing.
Answer:
The correct answer is brand community.
Explanation:
A brand community can be defined as a community formed on the basis of attachment to a product or a brand. The consumers that belong in a brand community generally share the same tastes, cultures, and values.
The main characteristics of a brand community are
- Shared consciousness
- Sense of moral responsibility
- Rituals and traditions
A number of companies show brand communities, for instance, Jeep, Harley Davidson motorcycles, Barbie, Lego, Royal Enfield motorcycles, etc.
Answer:
$530,000
Explanation:
Given that
Fixed manufacturing cost = 50000
Variable manufacturing cost = 12 per ton steel
Total number of steal produced = 40000
Recall that
Total manufacturing cost = Total fixed manufacturing cost + total variable manufacturing cost
Total variable manufacturing cost = variable cost per ton × output
= 40000 × 12
= 480,000
Therefore,
Total manufacturing cost = 50000 + 480000
= $ 530,000
Total manufacturing cost = $530,000
Answer:
Option D would be the correct choice.
Explanation:
- The deeply disturbed capital recovery plan was an effort to remove the distressed assets among investment banks everything which gave the treasurer the ability to buy risky assets from corporate various financial institutions.
- The program proved ineffective as when the allocated cash wasn't used to support consumers, because although the firms weren't even investing because of immoral incentives.
All other choices don't apply to a particular task. So option D seemed to be the right alternative.