Answer: "social proof" .
______________________________________________
Dylan's interpersonal orientation would be described as "other-transforming."
The active orientation is of formative interest since it takes after either other-changing or self-changing tracks at each level of social subjective advancement until the last stage in developing adulthood, when self—other transformation goes up against a shared, community oriented position. The other-transforming orientation endeavors to adjust the musings, sentiments, and activities of alternate, though a self-transforming introduction changes the self to reestablish social balance.
Producers. Government subsidies are paid to the producer of the product being subsidized. A good example of this is the farm subsidy program in the U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/07/02/GR2006070200024.html
Farmers (producers) are directly paid by the government to grow certain desired crops. Other groups like importers and exporters may benefit from subsidies but the key words in the question are "directly benefits." In other words, who is it receiving the subsidy money from the provider of the subsidy? The producer did.
Answer:
Yes, Canada is a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
No, peacekeeping is not a myth.
Explanation:
Peacekeepers country often put itself in a position as mediators between other countries that interacted with one another. Canada has done this several times throughout history (one small example would be when Canada mediate a conflict of imports quota between United States and Mexico).
On top of that, Canada also involved in several peacemakers mission when they sent their resources to help the people who are trapped within political conflicts. (one example of this would be when Canada sent help to Cambodia during four peace support missions from 1954 to 2000.)
From those historical events alone, I believe Canada could be considered as a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
