Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
Sample of convenience would be the correct answer. :)
Answer:
<h2>Also experience intrinsic reinforcement for good behavior</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>For good behavior, the children get rewarded 15 minutes of free time.</h2><h2 /><h2>Hope this helps.</h2>
I believe the answer would be C, taxation without representation caused anger.
In 1765, the stamp act congress met in New York to declare that the English Crown was not entitled to tax Americans who lacked representation in British parliament.
Government's role in a market economy is:
Let's understand what a market economy is about.
<h3>Market Economy</h3>
A market economy is known to be an economic system whereby decisions and pricing are actually guided and regulated by individual citizens and businesses. In other words, a market economy more market oriented.
It's important to note that though the role of government in this type of market is limited, yet government's role is important. The government help to intervene in certain situations and also for central planning.
In a market economy, entrepreneurs have the freedom to pursue profits. They can do this by creating outputs that are more valuable.
Learn more about market economy on brainly.com/question/350539
