Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the selling price per composite unit:</u>
<u></u>
selling price per composite unit= 1,280*0.6 + 530*0.4
selling price per composite unit= $980
<u>Now, the unitary variable cost per composite unit:</u>
Variable cost per composite unit= 780*0.6 + 280*0.4
Variable cost per composite unit= $580
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per composite unit
Break-even point in units= 150,000 / (980 - 580)
Break-even point in units= 375
<u>Finally, the number of units per product:</u>
Desks= 375*0.6= 225
Chairs= 375*0.4= 150
Answer:
$345,103 Is the answer I'm not good at explaining things so I won't attempt it.
Answer:
Explanation:
South Tel Communications is considering the purchase of a new software management system. The system is called B-image, and it is expected to drastically reduce the amount of time that company technicians spend installing new software. South Tel's technicians currently spend 6,000 hours per year on installation which cost South Tel $25 per hour. The owners of the B-image system claim that their software can reduce time on task by at least 25%. The system requires an initial investment of $55,000 and an additional investment of$10,000 for technician training on the new system. Annual upgrades will cost the firm $15,000 per year. Because the investment is comprised of software, it can be fully expensed in the year of the expenditure (no depreciation). South Tel faces a 30% tax rate and uses a 9% cost of capital to evaluate projects of this type.
A. Assuming that South Tel has sufficient taxable income from other projects so that it can immediately expense the cost of the software, what are the free cash flows for the project for years zero through five?
Total (65,000)
Cash flow year 1 - 5
Saving on installations per year 450,000
Less: Annual upgrades ( 15,000)
Total 435,000
Less: Tax (30%) (130,500);
Total project free cash flow 304,500.answer
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below:
Given that
The expected cash inlfows would be $9,400 for four years each
Rate of return is 7%
The Initial investment is $30,455
Based on the above information
The net present value is
= $9,400 × PVIFA factor for 7% at 4 years - $30,455
= $9,400 × 3.3872 - $30,455
= $31,840 - $30,455
= $1,385
Now the present value factor is
= $30,455 ÷ $9,400
= 3.2399
Now based on the factor table, the rate should be 9% for four years
b. Yes depend upon the internal rate of return, the park co should make the investment
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
The Dominant Strategy in a game is the strategy that a player will choose that will provide them with the highest payoff regardless of what the other player does.
In the above, the dominant strategy will be for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT.
By choosing left Raphael makes a payoff of 4 if Susan picks Left as well and a Payoff of 6 if Sudan picks Right. This is better than him picking Right and he will get a Payoff of 3 if Susan chooses Right as well.
The Nash Equilibrium is the strategy where both are making the best that they can given the strategy of the other player and deviating from it will give them less pay out.
The dominant strategy therefore is for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT and for SUSAN to choose RIGHT.
This is because Raphael will pick Left as it maximises their payoff and Susan will then pick a strategy that gives her the highest payoff based on Raphael's decision which is to go RIGHT.
