1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
14

Criminal trials for charges of murder and other serious crimes would be conducted in the

Law
2 answers:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

state court system unless the charges involved multiple states, non citizen immigrants or a foreign ambassador

Explanation:

A

Naddik [55]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: state court system

Explanation:

The state courts can be defined as the courts of general jurisdiction. These courts can hear all the cases not specifically selected for the federal courts. The trials for both civil and criminal cases can be conducted in the state courts. The state court follow and interpret the state laws. This helps the state to retain it's power in jurisdiction. Cases involving multiple states, foreign ambassador and non-citizen immigrants do not come under the jurisdiction of the state court.

You might be interested in
Describe the secret that felt like a knife cutting into Brian why was this thought so upsetting to him?
Alchen [17]
If this is from the hatchet the secret of his mother's infidelity serves to highlight the traumatic effect that his parents' divorce has had upon him.
6 0
2 years ago
What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
earnstyle [38]
C i think not surehwbbwbibebibbsjbs i need 20 letters to submit lol
5 0
3 years ago
A bill that has just been signed into law can still be struck down if
Ratling [72]

I think the Supreme Court has to rule unconstitutional.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Sir Robert Peel, set the stage for what is known today as modern policing.
Arte-miy333 [17]
Ans: Sir Robert Peel, the British Home Secretary, coined the term 'bobbies' as a nickname for cops and he believed policing needed to be restructured. In 1829 he passed the Metropolitan Police Act, which created the first British police force and what the 21st century knows for today's modern-day police.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Why do you think the Founding Fathers required different qualifications for the House and the Senate?
    5·1 answer
  • What are methods of seeking legal assistance or guidance in a foreign country?
    10·1 answer
  • The W-2 form is a form that tells you _______.
    8·1 answer
  • At a BAC of___blackouts are common.<br> A. 0.09<br> B. 0.13<br> C. 0.20
    9·1 answer
  • Buyer Carla feels like her broker discriminated against because of her religious beliefs. How long does Carla have following the
    10·1 answer
  • Help me please ♡♡
    15·1 answer
  • Phân tích khái niệm, đặc điểm, vai trò của ngân sách nhà nước.
    10·1 answer
  • Is the use of the dog to sniff the detained vehicle valid?
    10·2 answers
  • What did the french writer alexis de tocqueville call america
    9·2 answers
  • Question 4<br> A Identify at least three maior costs of owning a vehicle throughout a year.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!