Answer: I think the answer is all of the choices
Explanation:
Answer:
Correct Answer:
A. "It may be O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the good you produce outweighs the harm caused by the violation."
Explanation:
<u><em>Utilitarian theory</em></u><em> is a moral theory whereby an individual views the morality of an action being done as either good or bad based on the effect it would have. For example, is the dropping of bomb in an area in the cause of war. </em>
This could be viewed by some people as morally right since it will kill people but at same time stop the ongoing war rather than a situation where the war continues on the long run.
Answer:
I believe that the answer is A
Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h3>True.</h3>
Explanation:
No doubt individuals who post content on social media cannot just 'blow off some steam' unless it is thoroughly researched or proven otherwise. In most cases, individuals who post contents online are held legally responsible if their contents or statements are misleading or defamatory.
However, they are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activity as publishing wrong contents or making defamatory statements usually fall under the purview of 'tort' or civil cases. The parties are also liable to be sued for libel or defamation in civil courts.
