1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly_w [17]
4 years ago
12

Sam, a cleared DoD employee, receives an e-mail message on his NIPRNET account that contains classified information. Who should

he notify first of this incident?
Law
1 answer:
solong [7]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

He must notify Security Manager.

Explanation:

As the email received by Sam contains confidential content information, he must notify the Security Manager immediately, so that possible flaws in the security system can be investigated quickly and effectively, in addition, Security Manager is the professional capable of analyzing and determine the reason for sending that email, who sent it and what the landlords should do to avoid this type of problem.

You might be interested in
HELP, WIL MARK BRAINLEST
Orlov [11]

The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.

I hope I've helped! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Why are ethical constraints important in practicing medicine?
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

because they will be able to make decision which is right or wrong based upon their moral values. A couple who has conceived after a long medical intervention is requested to make a decision in regards to abortion in view to save the life of women who is comatose due to an accident.

I hope this helped!!!

8 0
3 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
4 years ago
A major cause of fatal traffic accidents in Tennessee is​
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:a law sue

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Part of analyzing a political cartoon is deciding whether or not you agree with its message. What is the BEST reason to include
omeli [17]

Answer:

The artist is attempting to provoke thought about a political topic.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would a city want to annex a suburban neighborhood?
    12·2 answers
  • Asking yourself whether your mind is currently occupied by things that can take your concentration off the road is something you
    13·1 answer
  • Explain each of the three branches of government. What are their duties and responsibilities?
    7·1 answer
  • how does the supreme court use tests? what test does the court use when determining whether a state can use a confession obtaine
    14·1 answer
  • The failure on the part of a police officer to accurately document in a report the reasons why an individual was stopped, questi
    14·1 answer
  • Go to the internet -Please include a reference in the discussion post of your case!
    7·1 answer
  • all new bills are given a letter and number code following their coding they are then to committees for closer inspection
    15·1 answer
  • A security services contractor can provide security patrol services to a business on a contractual basis
    13·1 answer
  • What form of government has the power divided among national, state, and local governments?
    7·2 answers
  • Because courts of law and equity have merged, the principles of equity are no longer applied. Group of answer choices True False
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!