1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KonstantinChe [14]
3 years ago
9

True or False. If the heading on a report reads "For the year ended June 30," we can assume that the report covers a fiscal year

and a full 12-month period.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Sonja [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: True

Explanation: In accounting, the heading of a report is to show if its a full years report or not.

For a report with the heading "For the year ended June 30,' it shows that the report is a one year report which is a twelve months calendar report.

For reports that are up to one year, their heading usually reads : ' A Nine months report ending 31st January' or 'A Eleven months report ending 31st March'.

You might be interested in
Social Darwinism is the theory that _____. the American frontier stopped people from rebelling in the United States life consist
Viktor [21]
The answer would be : Life consists of competitive struggles in which only the strong survive

It really similar with Darwin's "Survival of the fittest" theory
Social Darwinism is some sort of ideology, which apply the biological concepts of natural selection to the real modern world. According to this theory, the people with no power in society are similar with the creatures at the bottom of the food chain
3 0
4 years ago
A defendant was charged with the murder of a victim. During the course of the criminal trial, a witness testified on behalf of t
almond37 [142]

Explanation:

The witness's testimony is inadmissible.

Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.

The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.

These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.

In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.   A victim and his former business.

8 0
3 years ago
2. What are two changes made to Texas's constitution while Texas was part of the Confederacy?
Rudik [331]

Explanation:

In many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.

Length and Language

Whereas the U.S. Constitution is brief and vague and thus allows the federal government to broadly interpret the constitution and claim implied powers to meet specific public policy challenges, the Texas Constitution is long, detailed, and contains many statutory provisions that specify precisely what the government is allowed to do…or not do. When public policy challenges arise, Texas’ public officials do not have the option of interpreting the constitution in a manner that would allow them to deviate from the specific language of the document. Instead, public officials must amend the constitution if they wish to act outside of the detailed language set forth in the basic law. The location of language in each document is also revealing. Whereas specific civil liberties in the U.S. Constitution are mostly listed in amendments known as the Bill of Rights, a Bill of Rights forms the very first article of the Texas Constitution.

The Executive Branch

Governor Rick Perry signing a billWhereas the U.S. Constitution creates a unitary executive that concentrates executive power in the president, the Texas Constitution creates a plural executive that disperses executive power across multiple elected offices, thereby fragmenting the executive branch of government and preventing power over the executive branch from concentrating in any one individual or office. One point of interest, however, concerns the chief executive’s power to veto bills passed by the legislature. The line-item veto in the Texas Constitution allows the governor to veto specific items contained within appropriations bills passed by the legislature. At the federal level, however, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the line-item veto unconstitutional, arguing that it violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The fact that the Texas Constitution provides for a line-item veto demonstrates an affinity for limited government and limited spending, even if it comes at a cost of granting power to the governor in a way the rest of the constitution is designed to avoid.

The Legislative Branch

Interior photo of the Texas House of RepresentativesLegislatively, there is very little in the U.S. Constitution that limits the tax and spending policies which U.S. Representatives and Senators may write into law. In Texas, however, detailed restrictions on tax and spending policies significantly restrict what state legislators are actually allowed to write into law. For example, legislators are constitutionally forbidden from implementing a tax on personal income or allowing the state government to go into debt, and the constitution mandates that specific percentages of the state budget be spent on specific policy areas, most notably for public schools and universities as stipulated in Article 7. Furthermore, the U.S. Congress is a full-time, professional legislature that meets annually; members of Congress make their living as elected officials. But the Texas legislature is a part-time, non-professional legislature that meets every two years for 140-day sessions. The constitutionally mandated salary of $7,200 per year compels members of the Texas legislature to earn a living outside politics.

6 0
3 years ago
A primary source for getting specific information on a particular bill is
otez555 [7]
The correct answer is C. The Congressional Record.

Besides this, you might also look in the congressional library.
4 0
3 years ago
By sustainable development, Reed means that commercial lumber companies and ranchers should replant the tropical forest after th
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

The statement is true or false.

Explanation:

<em>Reafforestation which is the process of replanting trees</em> in order to regenerate the lost trees in a particular region is a simple way of fighting tree losses due to the activities of commercial lumber companies and ranchers.

Normally, <em>an average tree takes between 1 year and 10 years</em> to grow up to maturity. The more trees are cut down, t<em>he more the soil macro and micro fauna are disrupted</em>. Inorder to regenrate the exploited areas, it it highly encouraged to leave those areas for few years to be able to recover fully.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To whom or what is Truman referring when he refers to totalitarian countries
    9·2 answers
  • Assume that the domain A and codomain B for function f are both finite sets and that f is an onto function. What is the necessar
    8·1 answer
  • Because different societies often attach alternate meanings to things, these representations of ideas are referred to as _______
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following most accurately describes Right of americans citizens to privacy
    14·1 answer
  • Maximilien Robespierre was the head of a. the Committee of Public Safety. c. Napoleon’s army. b. the National Convention. d. the
    7·1 answer
  • What is a voluntary response​ sample? Choose the correct answer below. A. A sample in which the researchers decide which subject
    10·1 answer
  • What did the attack on Fort Sumter signify?
    9·1 answer
  • The river labeled with the number 1 on the map above is the __________ River. A. Danube B. Volga C. Lena D. Ob
    9·2 answers
  • Who was critical of Black Nationalism? Why were they critical?
    14·1 answer
  • Apply michael porter's three strategies and the five forces model for successfully competing in the marketplace to a new busines
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!