1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
11

Given the multitude of treatment options available, how do clients/patients determine which therapeutic style is best for them?

Which therapeutic style do you feel is most effective, and why? Please help
Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
Xelga [282]3 years ago
7 0

Answer / Explanation

First, we need to understand that the mode of therapy a client or patient choose to adopt is relative. It all depend on how comfortable and to what level they are willing to adopt or follow up with the therapy and mostly important client / patient determine which therapeutic style is best for them based on their believe on the level of positive result they will achieve from the style. We should also note that there is no one mode of therapy fit for all.

I personally feel the CBT, that is the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is one of the best therapy style being that it focus on the most important part of our health which is our mental health. It is an approach that address mental balancing and how best to cope with stress. It is of a believe that once we attain mental stability, it will be more easier to deal with other areas of our life such as emotion,stress, etc.

The Cognitive Behavioral Therapy also focuses on how relatively bad thoughts, feelings and individual behavior affects each other consequentially leading a client / patient to have a feeling of the symptoms of illness and also literally become involved in uneasy situations.

So adopting the CBT will basically address the fundamental which is the mental health.

kari74 [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The patient-based method will be the most efficient.

Explanation:

Therapeutic is an important branch in medicine especially when it comes to counselling. one of the essential principles is to have a patient-centered approach. This means that the nurse practitioner focuses on the best possible methods to put patients at ease. It means that the medical practice will involve more of counselling, with the patient taking a lead to air out their dealings and their pains. This method is effective because it releases the tension in the patients.

You might be interested in
Which was a positive effect of the Columbian Exchange for Native American cultures?
lapo4ka [179]
Positive outcomes of the Columbian Exchange include technological advances in farming, architecture, and weaponry.
5 0
3 years ago
What the correct answer to this question now c or d
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

<h2>answer to this question is (c) </h2>

<h3>hope you are satisfied with my answer</h3>

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
With the exception of Hawaii, the map shows the pattern of production for coffee beans by country. If the map was reproduced at
tekilochka [14]

Answer: C, The states in northern Mexico and northern India would not show any production. *

Explanation: Both the southern states of Mexico and India are known to produce coffee and I believe that their northern states produce little to no coffee. Additionally, East Africa and Southeast Asia are major producers of coffee beans so A and B are inaccurate.*

*This answer is not by any means entirely correct and is my own assumption but if you do a little research on the coffee production of Mexico and India, you will find that their southern states are often mentioned, and more so than their northern states.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is dispersal and elevation ?​
Kobotan [32]
Little is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. Because mutualism positively affects the fitness of all species involved in the interaction, one hypothesis is that the richness of species involved should be positively correlated across their range, especially for obligate relationships. Alternatively, if mutualisms involve multiple mutualistic partners, the distribution of mutualists should not necessarily be related, and patterns in species distributions might be more strongly correlated with environmental factors. In this study, we compared the distributions of plants and vertebrate animals involved in seed‐dispersal mutualisms across the United States and Canada. We compiled geographic distributions of plants dispersed by frugivores and scatter‐hoarding animals, and compared their distribution of richness to the distribution in disperser richness. We found that the distribution of animal dispersers shows a negative relationship to the distribution of the plants that they disperse, and this is true whether the plants dispersed by frugivores or scatter‐hoarders are considered separately or combined. In fact, the mismatch in species richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds is dramatic, with plants species richness greatest in the in the eastern United States and the animal species richness greatest in the southwest United States. Environmental factors were corelated with the difference in the distribution of plants and their animal mutualists and likely are more important in the distribution of both plants and animals. This study is the first to describe the broad‐scale distribution of seed‐dispersing vertebrates and compare the distributions to the plants they disperse. With these data, we can now identify locations that warrant further study to understand the factors that influence the distribution of the plants and animals involved in these mutualisms.

Introduction
A central problem in ecology is to understand the patterns and processes shaping the distribution of species. There is a preponderance of studies of species richness at broad geographic scales (Hawkins et al. 2003, Rahbek et al. 2007, Stein et al. 2014, Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) that has facilitated our understanding of why species are found where they are, a central tenet within the domain of ecology (Scheiner and Willig 2008). Most commonly, these studies find species distributions to be correlated with resource availability and use environmental variables (e.g. temperature and productivity; Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) to explain putative determinants of the distributions. Environmental variables are only one determinant of species’ distributions. Another, species interaction, is a key and understudied determinant of species’ distributions (Cazelles et al. 2016). In fact, in some cases species interactions may be more important for determining distribution than environmental variables (Fleming 2005).

When species interact, we expect their geographic distributions to be correlated – either positively or negatively – depending on the effect (or sign of the interaction) of one species on the other (Case et al. 2005). For pairwise interactions, where one species benefits from another species, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and abundance due to the increase in the average fitness of the benefitting species where they overlap (Svenning et al. 2014). Furthermore, most species interactions are not simply pairwise, but diffuse, consisting of multiple interacting species, here referred to as guilds (with guilds referring to species that use the same resource). It therefore follows that where one guild benefits from another guild, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and richness of the guids. This should be true in the case of mutualisms, where both sides of the interaction share an increase in average fitness from being together (Bronstein 2015), and there is some evidence for correlated geographic distributions of mutualists in the New World (Fleming 2005). One example of a mutualism where both sides of the interaction have a fitness advantage in each other's presence is animal‐mediated seed dispersal. Because both interacting species and guilds in seed dispersal mutualism benefit from the relationship we would predict that the richness of animal‐dispersed plants ought to be correlated with the richness of their animal dispersers and vice versa. To our knowledge, this prediction has never been tested on a large geographic scale.
3 0
3 years ago
16. Which of the following is legal in<br> Florida?
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

D, Non of the above

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best explains why income alone doesnt alone doesnt determine wealth
    15·1 answer
  • Which is the most accurate definition of bankruptcy?
    11·1 answer
  • What are three reasons that u.s. cotton is so successful?
    13·1 answer
  • The company A produces products a, and the company B produces products b. It is known that 3 percent of companies that produce p
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an action that people in Florida could take to help protect the Everglades?
    8·1 answer
  • The following diagram projects the age structure of the United States for the year 2050. Explain how the diagram would likely ch
    11·1 answer
  • The creators of the mixed economic system were from ___
    14·2 answers
  • I need your help fasttttt thank you
    9·1 answer
  • Depression and bipolar disorder are categorized as __________ disorders.
    12·2 answers
  • Is it important for you that your career is aligned with your values? Why or why not? Give an example that demonstrates your ans
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!