Answer:
D
Explanation:
D is the answer sjkrkdrir
The answer to the question is Gina (B) is more likely to be perceived as overemotional and incompetent.
This is mainly because of her gender – since Gina is female, and females are often stereotyped as highly influenced by feelings when exhibiting their behaviors, thus, she will be judged as overemotional due to this. She would also be judged as more incompetent than Bill.
<span>1 candy cost 1
2 candies cost 1+.50=1.50 ( here D is not an integer, hence we cannot buy 2 candies . so we can reject all cases where D is non Integer)
3 candies cost 1.50 +1 =2.50
4 candies cost 2.50+.50= 3
5 candies cost 3+1= 4
6 candies cost 4+.50= 4.50
7 candies cost 4.50+1=5.50
8 candies cost 5.50.+.50= 6
9 candies cost 6+1= 7
.....
13 candies cost =10
(i) D is prime
D=3 and N=4 (N is even)
D=7 N=9 (N is odd )
not sufficient
(ii) D is not Divisible by 3
D=1 N=1
D=4 N =5
D=7 N=9
D=10 N=13
so we see if D is not divisible 3 then N is always odd.</span>
The answer is C. Replace workers with machine
It's common for a company to replace workers with maschines in order to do hard menial labour such as wrapping packages, cutting products, shaping the products, moving the raw material, etc. which could increase efficiency and lower wage levels at the same time
Answer:
a. The company must have had net income equal to zero in 2009.
Explanation:
If on its 2008 balance sheet, Sherman Books showed a balance of retained earnings equal to $510 million, and on its 2009 balance sheet, the balance of retained earnings was also equal to $510 million; then what is true is that the company must have had net income equal to zero in 2009.
Retained earnings is the profit amount or net income left over and taken back into the business after it has paid out dividends to its shareholders.
However it is unlikely that the company will pay out the entire amount it earns in a particular year but a percentage of earnings.
In the case of Sherman, it is unlikely that the company made a profit of $200 million and paid out every bit as dividends to shareholders but what is most likely is that there was no profit made for retention in 2009
