Answer:
I just did this I forgot it sorry
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Also called “legal presumptions;” those which derive their force and effect from the law, rather than their natural tendency to produce belief
Hey there!
The answer would be Bush V. Gore
Bush V. Gore was a decision in the United States Supreme court that settles a recount dispute in Florida’s 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
not required to hear the case.
Explanation:
The United States Court of Appeals is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.
In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.
Answer:
Those who defend the use of animals in research contend that nonhuman animals are enough like humans to make them scientifically adequate models of humans, but different enough to make it morally acceptable to experiment on them. In addition to the ethical objections to causing suffering to other sentient species, inherent issues with animal models including differences from humans in both size and physiology, genetic differences, and variations in biological targets limit the ability of data collected from an animal model to be translated to people.
<h2>
HOPE I HELP U</h2>
