All of the above are relevant factors to be evaluated for moral intensity except
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moral intensity is the intensity of feeling that a person has about the values of a moral choice.
- The magnitude of the consequences: This is the quantity of the evils forced on the victims of the decision.
- Social consensus: This is the point of social recognition that an act is either moral or sinful.
- Proximity: This is the sense of intimacy, either culturally, psychologically, or bodily, that the soul has for the victims of the act in question.
- The concentration of effect: This is an inverse function of the number of characters hit by an act of any given measure.
Answer:
Neuro-imaging
Explanation:
Neuro-imaging technique is used to study the clinical problems in the patients, to scan the brain. Nero imaging techniques are several in numbers.
<u>The Neuro-imaging technique is divided into two types:
</u>
- The structural imaging: The structural neuroimaging techniques are CT or CAT and MRI.
- The functional imaging: The functional neuroimaging techniques are PET, rCBF, fMRI, etc.
Thus these are some technique that is used to study the self of the brain directly.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option D (Fundamental attribution error).
Explanation:
A common method of prejudice throughout cognitive psychology seems to be the fundamental attribution mistake or error.
- Fundamentally, it includes putting a greater emphasis on administrative traits of appearance to clarify the actions, someone, in a particular circumstance, instead of always worrying about actual physical subjective.
- Humans appear to over-emphasize qualitative even persona-based interpretations of actions found in others often under-emphasizing situational interpretations.
Therefore, the given statement illustrates the above error.
Well i was thinking bc and all that but looking at the picture i think dinosaurs lol
