Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

8

1/2(2g-3)=-4(g+1) show work please do this ASAP

2 answers:

Neko [114]2 years ago

8 0

G=(-12) Hope this helps!

lozanna [386]2 years ago

6 0

<span><span>1/2<span>(<span>2g−3</span>)</span></span>=<span>−<span>4<span>(g+1)</span></span></span></span>
<span><span>1/2<span>(<span>2g−3</span>)</span></span>=<span>−<span>4<span>(g+1)</span></span></span></span>
<span><span>g+<span>−3/2</span></span>=<span><span>−4g</span>−4</span></span>
<span><span><span>g+<span>−3/2</span></span>+4g</span>=<span><span><span>−4g</span>−4</span>+4g</span></span><span><span>5g+<span>−32</span></span>=−4</span>
5g+−3/2+3/2=−4+3/2
<span><span>
5g</span>=<span>−5/2</span></span>
<span><span>5g/5</span>=<span><span>−52</span>5</span></span><span>
g=<span>−1<span>2

Hoped I helped!</span></span></span>

You might be interested in

Which ratio is equivalent to 9/36

balandron [24]

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Find the GCF. List out the factors of the numerator and the denominator. 1, 3, 9 are the factors of 9, while 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 36 are the factors of 36. 9 is a common factor of both of them, so the GCF is 9.

Step 2: Divide the numerator and denominator by 9 (the GCF). 9/9 is 1. 36/9 is 4. This means that our fraction is 1/4. The fraction is in simplest form.

5 0

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIST AS SOON AS I CAN is this 32, maybe? i have no idea.

Feliz [49]

Answer:

y ≈ 32.0°

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the triangle is right use the sine ratio to find y

sin y = $\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}$ = $\frac{9}{17}$ , thus

y = $sin^{-1}$ ( $\frac{9}{17}$ ) ≈ 32.0° ( nearest tenth )

8 0

3 years ago

Math can anyone help me

dangina [55]

Answer:

C. $\frac{4}{10}$ and $\frac{10}{25}$

Step-by-step explanation:

The proportion between these fractions is true. Multiply 4/10 (numerator and denominator) by 2.5 to get 10/25. This is the only correct option.

Hope it helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Using appropriate properties find: <br> 6/5 × -5/7 -3/4 -5/7 × 4/5

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

1 and 4/35

Step-by-step explanation:

Use distribution property to solve:

6/5 × -5/7 -3/4 -5/7 × 4/5 = -5/7 ( 6/5 - 3/4 ) x 4/5 = -5/7 ( 24/20 - 15/20 ) x 4/5 = -5/7 (-39/20) x 4/5 = 780 / 700 = 1 4/35

4 0

3 years ago

A teacher was interested in finding out whether a special study program would increase the scores of students on a national exam

bija089 [108]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs. $T > t_{\alpha /2;n-1}$

here obs.T=1.879

$\therefore obs.T \ngtr 2.447=t_{0.025;6}$

we accept $H_o:\mu _{1}=\mu_{2}$ at 5% level of significance.

i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.

1.

this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.

Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.

we assume that $X_i \sim N(\mu _{1},\sigma _{1}^{2}) Y_i \sim N(\mu _{2},\sigma _{2}^{2})$ independently

We want to test $H_0:\mu_{1}=\mu_{2} vs H_1:\mu_{1}\neq \mu_{2}$

define $D_i=X_i-Y_i , i=1(1)8$

now $D_i\sim N(\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}=\mu _{D},\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}=\sigma _{D}^{2}) , i=1(1)8$

the hypothesis becomes

$H_0:\mu_{D}=0 vs H_1:\mu_{D}\neq 0$

in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before

i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .

3 0

2 years ago