1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
3 years ago
8

1. If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter o

f the figure?
2. If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the area of the figure?

3. What would happen to the perimeter and area of a figure if the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally? For example, if the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the width did not change? Or if the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?
Mathematics
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Part 1) The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor (see the explanation)

Part 2) The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures (see the explanation)

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the perimeter of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its perimeters is equal to the scale factor

so

The perimeter of the new figure must be equal to the perimeter of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor

Part 2) If a scale factor is applied to a figure and all dimensions are changed proportionally, what is the effect on the area of the figure?

we know that

If all dimensions are changed proportionally, then the new figure and the original figure are similar

When two figures are similar, the ratio of its areas is equal to the scale factor squared

so

The area of the new figure must be equal to the area of the original figure multiplied by the scale factor squared

Part 3) What would happen to the perimeter and area of a figure if the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally? For example, if the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the  width did not change? Or if the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?​

we know that

If the dimensions were changed NON-proportionally, then the ratio of the corresponding sides of the new figure and the original figure are not proportional

That means

The new figure and the original figure are not similar figures

therefore

Corresponding sides are not proportional and corresponding angles are not congruent

so

<em>A) If the length of a rectangle was tripled, but the  width did not change?</em>

<em>Perimeter</em>

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2W ----> P=6L+2W

The perimeter of the new figure is greater than the perimeter of the original figure but are not proportionals

<u>Area</u>

The original area is A=LW

The new area  would be A=(3L)(W) ----> A=3LW

The area of the new figure is three times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

<em>B) If the length was tripled and the width was decreased by a factor of 1/4?</em>

<u>Perimeter</u>

The original perimeter is P=2L+2W

The new perimeter would be P=2(3L)+2(W/4) ----> P=6L+W/2

The perimeter of the new figure and the perimeter of the original figure are not proportionals

<u><em>Area</em></u>

The original area is A=LW

The new area  would be A=(3L)(W/4) ----> A=(3/4)LW

The area of the new figure is three-fourth times the area of the original figure but its ratio is not equal to the scale factor squared, because there is no single scale factor

You might be interested in
According to an NRF survey conducted by BIGresearch, the average family spends about $237 on electronics (computers, cell phones
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

7.64% probability that they spend less than $160 on back-to-college electronics

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the zscore of a measure X is given by:

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this problem, we have that:

\mu = 237, \sigma = 54

Probability that they spend less than $160 on back-to-college electronics

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 160. So

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

Z = \frac{160 - 237}{54}

Z = -1.43

Z = -1.43 has a pvalue of 0.0763

7.64% probability that they spend less than $160 on back-to-college electronics

4 0
3 years ago
The sum of two numbers is -26. One number is 148 less than the other. Find the numbers
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

61 and -87

Step-by-step explanation:

If the numbers are x and x - 148, we can write the following equation:

x + x - 148 = -26

2x - 148 = -26

2x = 122

x = 61 so x - 148 = 61 - 148 = -87

5 0
3 years ago
A sequence of 7 numbers starts with 8. The second number in the sequence is unknown and may be positive or negative. The third t
scoray [572]

Answer:

4

Explanation:

a_1=8,a_7=0

Since the third term is the sum of the two previous terms

a_3=a_2+a_1

a_7=a_6+a_5

a_7=a_5+a_4+a_4+a_3

Continuing in like manner

a_7=5a_3+3a_2

Since a_3=a_2+a_1

a_7=5(a_2+a_1+3a_2

a_7=5a_2+5a_1+3a_2

a_7=8a_2+5a_1

Recall: a_1=8,a_7=0

0=8a_2+5*8

8a_2=-40

a_2=-5

The sequence is therefore:

8,-5,3,-2,1,-1,0

The sum of the seven numbers is 4.

8 0
3 years ago
The quotient of a number and -5 increased by 1 is at most 7
Vesnalui [34]
X/-5 +1 (is less than or equal to) 7
I can't paste the less than or equal to sign but it's < with a line underneath
6 0
3 years ago
Proving That All Circles Are Similar
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Figures can be proven similar if one, or more, similarity transformations (reflections, translations, rotations, dilations) can be found that map one figure onto another. In our attempt to prove all circles are similar, a translation and a scale factor (from a dilation) will be found to map one circle onto another.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you solve <br>20y-15-6y
    14·1 answer
  • Intercepts of x-2y=2
    11·1 answer
  • Sushil was thinking of a number. Sushil adds 72 to the number, then doubles the result to get
    15·1 answer
  • 61
    13·1 answer
  • Can you please answer the following
    8·1 answer
  • The refrigerator came In a box that was 6 feet high 3 feet wide and 3 In a half feet deep what was the volume of the box
    15·1 answer
  • Given f (x) = 4x + 3 and g (x) = 2x - 1
    7·1 answer
  • Select the correct graph of the equation.
    5·1 answer
  • EASY ALGEBRA QUESTION<br><br> Please help. This is worth 20 points and I will give brainliest!
    12·2 answers
  • I need help!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!