D. Islam spread inside and outside the new Arab Muslim Empire.
The thing that they should do in that situation is: <span>you must slow to the slowest speed at which you can safely steer your vessel.
The law enforcement probably want to do a quick checkup to you and you could only proceed after the officer clear you out from potential violations</span>
Answer: Option(a) is correct option
Explanation:
Normative statements are the statements that include value that is used for describing desirability and undesirability of situation.It is based on further requirements, need and perspective.
According to the question, statement that provide description about world should be is a normative statement as it describes the possible requirements for world .
Other options are incorrect because descriptive statement is based on objective and facts. Economist hired by government or in scientific field is not described through world description. Thus, the correct option is option(a).
According to Americaslibrary.. It was a tension between the American colonists and the British. British soldiers were guarding the Boston Customs House. One of the soldiers was enraged when they were hit and they fired into the crowd. When they were ordered not to fire.
Five colonists were shot and killed.<span />
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
