Answer:
1. Both were veterans of the War of 1812.
2. Both led US troops in Mexico.
3. Both ran for president of the United States as members of the Whig Party.
I don't know the rest sorry :(
Explanation:
- Winfield Scott was a general of the United States Army, diplomat and presidential candidate of his country. Nicknamed Old Fuss and Feathers, for his exaggerated adherence to regulations and his rigorous property in dressing, he served his country as a general for longer than any other character in US history and most historians describe him to the commander. most gifted of his time in America. In the course of his 50-year career he participated in the Anglo-American War of 1812, the American Intervention in Mexico, the Black Hawk War, the Seminole Wars and briefly in the American Civil War. He helped in the conception of the Anaconda Plan that would be used for the defeat of the Confederacy. He served as the Army's General Commander for twenty years, longer than any other in that position. National hero after the war with Mexico served as military governor of Mexico City. Such was his popularity that his party, the Whig, decided to nominate him instead of Millard Fillmore for the presidential election of 1852. Despite losing the election to the Democrat Franklin Pierce his popularity did not decrease, instead he was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant General becoming the first military since George Washington to hold the position.
- Zachary Taylor, also known as Old, Rough and Ready, was the twelfth president of the United States of America, from 1849 to 1850. He stood out for his great military career and for being the first president of the United States to take office without having been previously elected to no other public office. He was, in addition, the second president who died during the mandate. He died of gastroenteritis, although it is not excluded that it was cholera. Finally, it is also worth mentioning that he was the last president to own slaves during his presidency.
But responsibility for the slave trade is not simple. On the one hand, it was indeed the Europeans who purchased large numbers of Africans, and sent them far away to work in their colonies. On the other hand, Africans bear some responsibility themselves: some African societies had long had their own slaves, and they cooperated with the Europeans to sell other Africans into slavery. The Europeans relied on African merchants, soldiers and rulers to get slaves for them, which they then bought, at convenient seaports.
Africans were not strangers to the slave trade, or to the keeping of slaves. There had been considerable trading of Africans as slaves by Islamic Arab merchants in North Africa since the year 900. When Leo Africanus travelled to West Africa in the 1500s, he recorded in his The Description of Africa and of the Notable Things Therein Contained that, "slaves are the next highest commodity in the marketplace. There is a place where they sell countless slaves on market days." Criminals and prisoners of war, as well as political prisoners were often sold in the marketplaces in Gao, Jenne and Timbuktu.
Perhaps because slavery and slave trading had long existed in much of Africa (though perhaps in forms less brutal than the slavery practised in the Americas), Africans were untroubled by selling slaves to Europeans.
Answer:
This best illustrates: plasticity.
Explanation:
Our brains possess the amazing ability to change and adapt when we learn something, or even to find new paths and connections when they suffer some type of damage. That ability is called neuroplasticy, or simply plasticity.
When our brains find new paths or move functions from an area that is damaged to an undamaged area, that is called functional plasticity. <u>The type of plasticity described in the question, concerning the pianists, is called structural plasticity. It means the pianists' brains actually changed their structure as a result from learning and practicing to play the piano. Their auditory cortex is larger than what it would be in other people due to their learning.</u>
Answer: non-comparable decisions
Explanation:
This involves the process of making decisions about products or services from different categories. Hence making comparison among them difficult.
In this case, Linda and Cindy will have to make an overall evaluation of each option; using pros and cons for each activity. Both of them come to an unanimous decision.
