It looks like only A and B, but could be trick question?
Answer:
x+74
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to follow these rules:
+/+ = +
-/- = +
+/- = -
-/+ = -
so
positive numbers:
+2/+3 ; -2/-3 ; -1/-3 ; +1/+3
negative numbers:
+2/-3 ; -2/+3 ; -1/+3 ; +1/-3
