Answer:
The federal government can regulate Jen's activity citing the supreme court rule of the government ability to regulate any activity interstate or intrastate that affects interstate commerce.
In the line of this argument it means that a farmer growing and of goods affects interstate commerce.
The farmers best argument concerning the federal government regulating their activities due to interstate commerce is that his activities are purely local and although I don't believe any court will hear him out.
Explanation:
Answer:
6.4%
Explanation:
we need to divide this investor's income in two parts:
- dividends are not taxed = $5,000 x 5% = $250
- capital gains = (selling price - basis) x (1 - tax rate) = ($4,975 - $4,900) x (1 - 15%) = $75 x 85% = $63.75
total after-tax gains = $250 + $63.75 = $313.75 / $4,900 = 0.064 ≈ 6.4%
Suppose there is a decrease in the price of butter.There will be an increase in demand for bread.
<h3>Option (B) is correct</h3>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bread and butter are complementary goods. They are demanded and consumed together. So their demand are positively correlated which means an increase in demand of one will lead to the same increase the demand of other
If the Price of butter decreases, it will lead to an increase in the demand for butter. With the increasing demand for butter, the demand for bread will automatically increase. Both demands will move in the same direction.
B or D I believe I remember the question but it’s one of those 2
