Market structure is determined by the number and relative size of the firms in an industry.
- Market structure describes how different industries are categorized and distinguished based on how fiercely and in what ways they compete with one another for customers' goods and services. There are four different kinds of market structures: monopolistic competition, oligopolistic markets, perfect competition, and monopolistic markets.
- In economics, market structure illustrates how businesses are categorized and distinguished according to the sorts of items they sell and how external circumstances and elements impact their operations. It is simpler to comprehend the peculiarities of various marketplaces when there is a clear market structure.
- The four types of economic market structures are oligopoly, monopoly, perfect competition, and monopolistic competition. The following characteristics explain why the categories are different: In oligopoly, there are few producers, many in perfect and monopolistic competition, and one in monopoly.
Thus the correct answer is Option D.
To learn more about market structure, refer: brainly.com/question/27874368
#SPJ4
Professional letters for business
Answer:
Journal entry to record the Sale of Patent
Debit : Cash $750,000
Credit : Patent at Book Value $120,000
Credit : Profit and Loss $630,000
Journal entry to record the Sale of Equipment
Debit : Cash $325,000
Debit : Profit and loss $75,000
Debit : Accumulated depreciation $150,000
Credit : Equipment at Cost $550,000
Explanation:
During a sale transaction the entity recognizes 1. The Cash Proceeds resulting from the sale, 2. The Profit or loss resulting from the sale, 3.The entity derecognizes the Cost or Book Value of the Asset as well as the Accumulated depreciation.
A profit of $630,000 has been earned as a result of the sale of the Patent, whereas a loss of $75,000 has been incurred as a result of sale of Equipment.
Answer: a strategic channel alliance
Explanation: In simple words, strategic alliance refers to a business arrangement in which two organisations combine their resources for their mutual benefits.
Under such an arrangement two organisation agrees to combine their activities and efforts for a particular objective but still remain independent as two separate entities.
Such alliances are generally evident in situation where companies wants to exploit foreign markets. Hence from the above we can conclude that the arrangement between general mills and nestle is a strategic alliance.
