All categories

3 years ago

Why do firms generally prefer to borrow funds to obtain long-term financing rather than issue shares of stock?

1 answer:

4 0

The more firms get from obligation as opposed to issuing stocks, the more it can diminish the aggregate cost of capital in light of the fact that the enthusiasm from obligation is duty deductible which will help reduce the aggregate cost of capital. In any case, no firm can get from obligation everlastingly in light of the fact that, at one point in time, extra obligation financing will make the aggregate cost of capital increment rather than decline. So firms will get in view of their own enhanced capital structure to limit the aggregate cost of capital however much as could reasonably be expected. Also, in light of this upgraded capital structure, there is a point of confinement to how much a firm can keep getting from obligation.

You might be interested in

You just sold 500 shares of Wesley, Inc. stock at a price of $30.92 a share. Last year, you paid $32.04 a share to buy this stoc

Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

-$560

Explanation:

The computation of capital gain on this investment is shown below:-

Capital gain = (Stock price - Paid shares) × Sold shares

where,

The Stock price is $30.92

Paid shares is $32.04

And, the sold shares is 500 shares

Now placing these values to the above formula

So, the capital gain on this investment is

= ($30.92 - $32.04) × 500

= -$1.12 × 500

= -$560

5 0

2 years ago

Ziegler Inc. has decided to use the high-low method to estimate the total cost and the fixed and variable cost components of the

telo118 [61]

Answer:

a. $175.50 and $11,060,000

b. $31,242,500

Explanation:

The computation of the fixed cost and the variable cost per unit by using high low method is shown below:

Variable cost per units = (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (High units produced - low units produced)

= ($32,120,000- $25,100,000) ÷ (120,000 units - 80,000 units)

= $7,020,000 ÷ 40,000 units

= $175.50

Now the fixed cost equal to

= High total cost - (High units produced × Variable cost per unit)

= $32,120,000 - (120,000 units × $175.50)

= $32,120,000 - $21,060,000

= $11,060,000

Now the estimated total cost is would be

= Fixed cost + expected units of production × variable cost per unit

= $11,060,000 + 115,000 units × $175.50

= $11,060,000 + $20,182,500

= $31,242,500

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Choose the letter of the item that best completes the statement or answers the question. Last year Jackson earned $500,000, Vele

Vitek1552 [10]

1. According to their states’ tax laws, which require each one to pay a tax of $500 despite their different earnings, the best description of the tax is (c) regressive.

<h3>What is a regressive tax system?</h3>

A regressive tax system is one where taxpayers pay a disproportionate share of the tax burden, given their earning levels.

A regressive tax system is not proportional or progressive.

2. An example of an excise tax is (b) tax on perfume.

3. The amount Rose Chin paid for the purchase of school supplies based on the state sales tax of 5% is a) $12.60 ($12 x 1.05).

4. An example of a property tax is a) a tax based on the value of one's home.

5. The best example of the ability-to-pay principle is b) income tax.

6. An example of a tax based on the benefits-received principle is (a) bridge toll.

7. In the United States, taxes are used to accomplish all of the following except (c) determine which brands consumers buy.

8. For the apartment tenants, the tax is d) a sales tax.

9. The ultimate tax-burden bearer in question 8 is (d) the tenants.

10. An example of a protective tariff is (d) tax on the importation of foreign-made cars.

Thus, while income tax is mostly progressive in the United States, sales taxes are proportional, while some taxes are regressive because the amount paid is fixed and does not depend on the ability-to-pay principle.

Learn more about tax systems at brainly.com/question/12890967

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

The balance sheet for the partnership of Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria at January 1, 2017 follows. The partners share profits and

ANTONII [103]

Answer:

$115,714

Explanation:

If the partnership's assets were $540,000, and if we assume that there are no liabilities, then:

Nina's capital account should have been 3/10 x $540,000 = $162,000

Pinta's capital account should have been 2/10 x $540,000 = $108,000

Santa Maria's capital account should have been 5/10 x $540,000 = $270,000

If they decided to pay Nina only $135,000 for her partnership stake, then the remaining partnership's assets were $405,000. This means that the partnership's capital account should be divided as follows:

Pinta's capital account should have been 2/7 x $405,000 = $115,714

Santa Maria's capital account should have been 5/7 x $405,000 = $289,286

3 0

2 years ago

Madeline quits her job, at which she was earning $20,000 per year. She then takes $50,000 out of savings, on which she was earni

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

A. Madeline's accounting cost is $75,000

B. Madeline's economic cost is $100,000

C. Madeline's accounting profit is $75,000

D. Madeline's economic profit is is $50,000

Explanation:

A. To calculate Madeline's accounting cost we would have to make the following calculation:

Madeline's accounting cost=cost of supplies+rent+labour costs

Madeline's accounting cost=$50,000+$10,000+$15,000

Madeline's accounting cost=$75,000

B. To calculate Madeline's economic cost we would have to make the following calculation:

Madeline's economic cost=explicit cost+implicit cost

=$75,000+opportunity cost

=$75,000+0.10*$50,000+earning job

=$75,000+$5,000+$20,000

=$100,000

C. To calculate Madeline's accounting profit we would have to make the following calculation:

Madeline's accounting profit=revenue-accounting cost

=$150,000-$75,000

=$75,000

D. To calculate Madeline's economic profit we would have to make the following calculation:

Madeline's economic profit=revenue-economic profits

=$150,000-$100,000

=$50,000

6 0

3 years ago