Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": certification of false financial statements.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a statute that aims to increase corporate governance and enhance internal control of companies. SOX's primary purpose is to protect stakeholders from false corporate financial statement representations. Investors must know that the financial information on which they rely is accurate and that their accuracy has been checked by an independent third party.
<em>Altering, destroying, covering-up or falsifying information in the financial statements of a firm is considered a crime since the SOX implementation with a maximum sentence of 20 years.</em>
Answer:
The correct option is fundamental analysis
Explanation:
Industry analysis centers on the competitive nature of the market where a business operates,hence it is a just a component of what makes fundamental analysis.
Operational analysis can be likened to performance measurement where the performance of a business is measured viz-a-viz the expected performance with to aligning actual performance with plan
Fundamental analysis is the correct option as it encompasses determining the value of stock by conducting both internal and external analysis of a business concern.
Answer: raise; reduce
Explanation:
A Supply shock is described as a situation where the supply of a good changes suddenly/ abruptly due to an unforeseen event.
Supply shocks can be positive but are usually negative so we will assume the supply shock is negative here.
If there is a negative supply shock, the amount of goods being produced will reduce abruptly which will force the supply curve to shift left.
It will then intercept the the demand curve at an equilibrium level that has a higher price and a lower quantity of output.
Think of it this way. Negative supply shock ⇒ less goods ⇒ scarcity ⇒ higher prices.
A shop that sells one type of thing
<span>Tony did not breach a contract because it was all up to Lorene and who she wanted to go with. Lorene is not obligated to go with either. Although Bill spent most of his allowance, he could still ask someone else, sell his ticket and or even go by himself. I do not think Tony could be held liable even if he knew. It was not a nice thing to flake on Bill, but ultimately, it was Lorene's decision to make.</span>
