Answer:
3 percent which is $30
Explanation:
The real value of money is measured against a basket of goods or services, or against a particular product or service. The real value is adjusted for inflation. In other words, the real value of money is its nominal value adjusted for inflation.
If the bank pays an interest rate of 4 percent, which leads to an increase of savings from $1000 to $1040, should prices increase by 1 percent, then the real value of money has increased by 3 percent. One percent increase in prices represents inflation. Keeping $1000 in the bank will earn a 3 percent real value or $30.
In the evolution of the internet e-commerce allows people to make transactions online is the event occurred most recently.
<h3>Why e-commerce has grown up so much?</h3>
Today ecommerce has very vast market online and people are likely to sell and purchase the things online rather than going to physical market.
The increase in e-commerce has brought the emergency of online payment of the goods and services in the ecommerce.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about e-commerce, click here:
brainly.com/question/14157556
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. A captive brand
Explanation:
-A captive brand is when a brand is produced by another party and owned by the retailer but there is no evidence of this and it is only sold by it.
-A complementary brand is when a brand is marketed together with another one to encourage the purchase of both.
-A cooperative brand is when a brand shares a promotion with another one.
-An exclusive brand is a brand that is produced by the retailer and it is sold using its name.
-A generic brand is when a product doesn't have a brand name and it has a lower price than the ones from well-known brands.
According to this, the answer is that the type of private label brand that carries no evidence of a retailer s affiliation, is manufactured by a third party, and is sold exclusively at the retailer is a captive brand.
Answer:
28%
Explanation:
She is an RHIA, which requires 30 hours of continuing education every two-year cycle.
Hence, 8.5/30 = 28.3 =28%( to the nearest whole number).
Same as with Canada which is where both my grandfathers came from. Let's see how many reasons I can come up with just off the top of my head and just for those two.
- They enjoyed the freedom of the First Amendment (speech, press, religion, assembly -- Canada has the same provision) that was not granted in the country they left. They never exercised those rights, I don't think, but their children and grandchildren did.
- They were free to raise their children so that they had the chance of being productive. My father was an MD, but he owed that piece of good fortune to his father. The country from which they came would never have allowed him to get all that education.
- They were able to eventually bring their wives and children with them. There was enough money to be made, even at jobs that didn't pay much, to bring them across the Atlantic.
- They were able, once the families were here, to turn their attention to bettering their conditions. They never became rich, but no one starved either. That's more than could be said about those relatives who didn't do as they did.
- They were free to travel. They didn't do that, but their children and especially their grandchildren did. That too was very limited where they came from.
- They had medical care and good medical care which was not given to just anyone where they came from.
