To bet , play games for money , risky .
Answer:
Always higher than manufacturing cost per unit for variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing continuously contains fixed overheads similarly while computing the manufacturing cost.
Conversely, under variable costing only adjustable overheads were included.
Thus, the manufacturing cost under absorption costing method is always higher than variable costing method
Therefore, per unit cost will always be higher under absorption costing than in variable costing.
So, option C is the correct option
Answer:
The amount of $4.8 million will be reported as current liabilities on 31 December 2018 and the amount of $14.4 will be reported as long term liabilities.
Explanation:
The current liabilities are the short term liabilities or obligations that a business is expected to pay or settle within a year's time period. The long term liabilities, on the other hand, are the liabilities or obligations which are due to be paid any time more than a year.
The outstanding amount on Note Payable on 31 December 2018 after the first repayment will be, 24 - 4.8 = $19.2 million
Out of the $19.2 million that is outstanding, $4.8 million are to be paid on 31 December 2019 that is within a year. Thus, this amount will be reported as a current liability as it is payable within a one year period.
The remaining amount of 19.2 - 4.8 = $14.4 million will be reported as a non current liability as it is payable after more than a year from today.
Answer:
$700
Explanation:
Given that
Work-In-Process inventory, April 1 = $200
Direct materials used in production = $125
Direct labor costs incurred = $300
Manufacturing overhead costs = $250
Work-In-Process Inventory, April 30= $175
The computation work-in-progress transferred to the finished goods is given below :-
= Work-In-Process inventory, April 1 + Direct materials used in production + Direct labor costs incurred + Manufacturing overhead costs - Work-In-Process Inventory, April 30
= $200 + $125 + $300 + $250 - $175
= $700
