Answer:
<h2>Spending on infrastructure projects is an example of <u>Discretionary Fiscal Policy</u> aimed at increasing real GDP and employment.</h2>
Explanation:
- A discretionary fiscal policy basically refers to the manipulation or adjustment of various fiscal instruments by the government such as public taxes and government spending.
- The aim of discretionary fiscal policy is to adjust the overall macroeconomic condition in any country based on the existing or current situation or scenario.
- Now,infrastructural spending is part of fiscal policy or instrument to adjust the macroeconomic condition of the country as reflected by necessary modification in the GDP and employment level.Hence, higher infrastructural spending by the government would expectedly increase the residential and commercial construction projects in the country thereby,enhancing the GDP and the employment level in the country and boost the overall economy.
Productivity, hope this helps:)
Answer:
Supply side is the view point of the Firms or the Businesses.
Explanation:
As the law of demand deals with the consumers side, the law of supply deals with the suppliers or the firms/businesses.
this tries to explain the factors that affect the supply, such as the prices of the substitutes and complements, the price of a commodity itself, taxes, government subsidies, technological influences, etc...
in this question, the 1st option, consumer is wrong. However, in certain situations, Government can be acted as a "supplier" (if there is a government monopoly on the supply of a good or a service", and government is a heavy influencer of supply through the implementaion of taxes and subsidies!
Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.