Answer:
It is a social system theory that attempts to formally approach different kinds of social rule systems in a unified manner. Social rules systems include institutions such as norms, laws, regulations, taboos, customs, and a variety of related concepts and are important in the social sciences and humanities.
Explanation:
Answer:
Jesus Christ
Explanation:
He the lord son and a savior
Answer:
Generally, conflicts arise from mismatches between power, organizational demands and feelings of personal worth..
<em>Human relations view of conflict means to accept that conflict is a important aspect of any organization. Rather than seeing it as a negative or a necessity it needs to be managed. If all of that is right. Then an example would be; If one person agues that Alternating current electricity is better than direct current electricity and the other says the opposite. The outcome now is that it is more beneficial we use both in everyday life. A/C is a safer and simplistic use of electricity for power converters while d/c is needed to supply a constant frequency current to LED lighting. Without both sides advancing we wouldn’t be able to keep progressing. or maybe that is a bad example… Maybe you start a business and you feel quality is a better formula than quantity. But you have such a high demand for your product your cheaper opponents outsell you. So now you decide to make a part of the product with a cheaper material. Thus still being superior product yet the quality has decreased. But now you have achieved a higher goal than you would have otherwise. I think conflict helps a company grow but if it leans too far one way outcome will become someone else’s achievement. If you cut out all conflict you may never be able to adapt to succeed.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
Explanation:
It wasn't exactly disagreeable speech. The Supreme Court wrangled about the place of the American Flag in American life.
The core issue was whether or not desecration of the US flag is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's final decision was yes but only by a 5-4 margin.
So in effect disagreeable speech was upheld. Various attempts have been made to make burning of the flag just going a bit too far. All attempts have failed and the right to disagreeable speech has been upheld.
The Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
<h3>What was the conviction of
Ernesto Miranda?</h3>
The case was related to Miranda who was found guilty of kidnapping and ra-pe and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count.
After the appeal of the case, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, hence, it overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Read more about Ernesto Miranda
brainly.com/question/2039279
#SPJ1
