Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The implicit equation is given as:

In implicit differentiation, we treat 'y' as a function of 'x' and differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to 'x' and then collect all the
together and finally solve for
.
So, differentiating both sides of the above equation with respect to 'x'. This gives,

Therefore, the derivative
implicitly is:

Answer:
C. H0: PL - PR = 0
Ha: PL - PR > 0
The null hypothesis for this case is that left-handed pitchers in a baseball league are not more likely to strike out batters than right-handed pitchers are. That is the proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout is significantly equal for both left-handed and right-handed pitchers.
H0: PL - PR = 0
The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout is significantly higher for left-handed pitchers
Ha: PL - PR > 0
PL - proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout for left-handed pitchers
PR - proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout for right-handed pitchers
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.
The null hypothesis for this case is that left-handed pitchers in a baseball league are not more likely to strike out batters than right-handed pitchers are. That is the proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout is significantly equal for both left-handed and right-handed pitchers.
H0: PL - PR = 0
The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout is significantly higher for left-handed pitchers
Ha: PL - PR > 0
PL - proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout for left-handed pitchers
PR - proportion of at-bats resulting in a strikeout for right-handed pitchers
Answer: In June 2097
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the model, to find how many years t should take for
we must solve the equation
. Substracting 21100 from both sides, this equation is equivalent to
.
Using the quadratic formula, the solutions are
and
. The solution
can be neglected as the time t is a nonnegative number, therefore
.
The value of t is approximately 85 and a half years and the initial time of this model is the January 1, 2012. Adding 85 years to the initial time gives the date January 2097, and finally adding the remaining half year (six months) we conclude that the date is June 2097.
Answer:
12 1/2 or 12.5
Step-by-step explanation:
all you have to do is multiply 15 times 5/6
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of jars is x.
<u>80 liters distributed, each jar has:</u>
<u>Redistribution with 4 less jars, each jar now has:</u>
<u>Each jar has now twice the amount:</u>
- 80/x*2 = 80/(x - 4)
- 2/x = 1/(x - 4)
- 2(x - 4) = x
- 2x - 8 = x
- x = 8
She prepared 8 jars at the start