Do US Constitution provides the floor beneath individual rights, well stating constitutions can provide greater but not lesser protection. So I think it’s c but I’m not sure!!
Answer:
The Dyer Act
Explanation:
The Dyer Act made interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle a federal crime and allowed for federal help in prosecuting such cases.
Answer:
Please finish the question.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
Answer:
Explanation:
Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?
the right to have a lawyer present during police interrogation
the right to remain silent while being arrested by police
the right to expunge criminal convictions from the record after winning an appeal
the right to investigate a crime for which the defendant has been accused
