Answer and Explanation:
The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.
The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.
Answer:
The employees.
Explanation:
Business and labor groups oversee and protect rights of workers .
The point in the criminal justice process the whistle-blowing would have occurred is called the count bargaining.
There are also other three different types of plea bargaining, which are the charge bargaining, the sentence bargaining, and the facto bargaining.
<h3 /><h3>What is count bargaining?</h3>
Corresponds to a negotiation where the confession is related to the count bargain, that is, when the suspicions are not recognized the prosecutor can ignore the guilt in suspicions of a confession.
This occurs through the defendant alleging only one of the original charges, the others then being dropped. An example of a count bargain occurs when a prosecution accuses an individual of assault and theft, and the parties decide that the defendant will plead only guilt on the assault charge, so the prosecution will ignore the defendant's guilt on the theft charge.
Therefore, the count bargaining is a process of fairness that the allegation is in respect of the accused of the allegations, being a form of negotiaton.
Find out more about count bargaining here:
brainly.com/question/11819753
#SPJ1
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
