4:6 4’7 4:7 because 4 is into the 15
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
12/16
If you divide 12 by 4 you get 3 and if you divide 16 by 4 you get 4 so that would be 3/4
Answer:
The error is at step (3) .
The correct step (3) will be,

=
[by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The error is at the step (3) , because the student has tried to prove the quotient rule of logarithms by using the property i.e., 'The quotient rule of logarithm' itself , i.e. ,by assuming the property does hold before proving it. So, the proof is fallacious.
The correct step (3) will be,

=
[by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.
If a number is positive, Leila's theory that 75% of a number will always be greater than 50% of another number is <em>true</em>;<em> </em>however, if both numbers are negative, or if the number of which she finds 50% is much greater than the number of which she finds 75%, Leila's theory could be incorrect.
This inequality shows that Leila is correct:

(which simplifies to

)
This inequality shows that Leila is incorrect:

(which simplifies to

)
Hope this helps!