The correct answer is: "Purchasing Power Parity"
The theory of the Purchasing Power Parity is used to compare the cost of life and living standards between two countries that use two different currencies. This is done by comparing two curriencies through a basket of goods, by comparing their market prices and, therefore, how they are valued under each currency. This enables to conclude how much of each currency you need to purchase an specific product (a bike) and hence, the purchasing power of consumers who hold that currency.
Answer:
The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
Explanation:
People are directly given power
Answer:
It is an Evasion Plan of Action.
Explanation:
An Evasion Plan of Action also known as EPA is a plan widely used by the armed forces or any other institution that establishes direct combat missions.
This plan allows evasion strategies to be established promoting the institution to have a successful recovery, given its status within the conflict. All this through the collection of precious information about the conflict that allows the combat team to increase their strategies and establish a predictability of what may happen during the conflict.
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
