He is using the "Labeling" aspect of the categorization part of the perception process.
Labelling is portraying somebody or something in a word or short phrase.[1] For instance, depicting somebody who has infringed upon a law as a criminal. Labelling hypothesis is a hypothesis in human science which credits marking of individuals to control and distinguishing proof of degenerate conduct. It has been contended that labelling is fundamental for communication. However, the utilization of the term is frequently proposed to feature the way that the name is a depiction connected all things considered, as opposed to something characteristic for the named thing.
Religion, I believe church events maybe? Lol.
They all have a Parliment government systems.
Divided government
Divided government is a situation in the United States in which one party controls the presidency whereas other party control one or both the houses of the legislative branch. In the situation of divided government, there is a separation of power where the state is divided and each branch has independent powers and areas of responsibility to avoid conflict issues
Answer: At about the same time as.
In his study, Turiel interviewed children using hypothetical situations that resembled the types of struggles raised by the real-life events. The way that these children reasoned was very similar across real and hypothetical moral issues. Thus, we can say that children's ability to tell whether a character in a story has violated moral rules develops at about the same time as their ability to understand them in real life.
