The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?
Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.
From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.
Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.
Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,
In health and social care, as a practicioner you're usually required to not disclose any information about your client openly to other people.
The only exemption here is when doing an super- or intervision with your peers, here you can "breach" this confidentiality with obviously still presenting this person as an anonymous case.
Another exemption is when you're given information that revolves around possible hurting other people or self-hurting coming from the client itself.
Answer:
there is no one leader multiple people helped out with the United nations
The question is missing two important elements. The question: "Where do you stand on this issue?" and Why?
The question also invites us to watch a video for further reference. It is a TV News Show that interviews a lawyer, expert in the subject of marriage and divorce.
What the lawyer basically says is that the law states that the give is good only if it meets the condition of marriage. This means that it is the property of the other person meanwhile people are married. In my opinion, the ring should be a symbol of commitment, not as expensive as it has become due to marketing and advertising. If it is a commitment and things do not result, then, the ring loses its true value and should be returned.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, Confidentiality of the individual subject's responses.
Explanation:
When a researcher invites a therapist to participate in a small focus group to discuss the perception about the troubled adolescent girls and the relationships they have with their parents. People usually don't discuss their such private problems in public and don't want to disclose their identity when discussing such problems on forums like focus groups where some therapist is present to listen to their problems. So confidentiality is a crucial concern in this. Instead of watching for the breach of confidentiality from the focus group participants, the researcher must focus on maintaining the confidentiality of the group members.
