1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovangra [49]
3 years ago
12

Which situation would most likely increase the carrying capacity for humans

Biology
1 answer:
vredina [299]3 years ago
7 0

C. A new source of freshwater

Explanation:

The situation that would most likely increase the carrying capacity for humans in a certain region is the availability of new sources of freshwater.

In ecological terms, the carrying capacity of a place is the the number of people, animals, or crops which a region can support without environmental degradation.

  • A new source of freshwater provides new resources for the ecosystem.
  • In the freshwater, more fishes are available, more plants can grow around and a lot of biological activities can progress.
  • Water is essential for life.
  • Fresh water sources are incentives for choosing to live in a place or not.
  • A fresh water source increases the carrying capacity for humans in a certain region.

learn more:

Population changes brainly.com/question/2375366

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
Put in order from first to last
san4es73 [151]
Pro I
Meta I
Ana I
Telo I
Pro II
Meta II
Ana II
Telo II
4 0
3 years ago
How does the digestive system work with the muscular system?
Vadim26 [7]
<span>Receptors in muscles provide the brain with information about body position and movement. The brain controls the contraction of skeletal muscle. The nervoussystem regulates the speed at which food moves through the digestive tract.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What are frankenfoods? Are Genetically Modefied foods safe?
barxatty [35]

Opponents of GMOs have been unceasing in their campaign to vilify genetically modified foods by describing them as “Frankenfoods,” thus implying they are not natural and are potentially harmful.

“The practice of introducing new DNA and chemicals to seeds or animals (Aqua Advantage has developed a GMO fish) is similar to how Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein created his monster–—through piecing together lots of different organisms,” wrote the Organic Authority on its website—a common allusion in the anti-GMO world. “We all know what happened when the monster turned on Frankenstein, and many critics of genetic engineering have likened the inevitable backlash of GMO technology to the destruction and murderous rampage of Frankenstein’s monster.”

Many anti-GMO articles that warn of the dangers GM crops are often accompanied by an image of a tomato fruit or vegetable with syringes sticking out of them. Very often it is a fruit or vegetable for which there is no current GM equivalent such as a tomato. This depiction is used to reinforce the notion that GM foods are created in laboratories and not by nature and therefore are dangerous to consume.

With the constant barrage of scare-based imagery, it is not surprising that there is widespread public suspicion that GMOs are dangerous to human health. But there is little controversy surrounding GMOs within the scientific community with 88 percent of the members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science believing GMOs are “generally safe.” The safety of GMOs were once again reinforced by the May 2016 report by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, which concluded, there was “reasonable evidence that animals were not harmed by eating food derived from genetically engineered crops”, and epidemiological data indicated there was no increase in cancer or other health related problems associated with these crops entering our food supply.

David Zilberman, a professor of agriculture and resource economics at the University of California, Berkley, has noted that Frankenfood was “a terrible word, a stigmatization word, one that’s used to scare people… People are afraid of GMOs for little or no reason. GM is simply a tool. Because it allows us to modify plants with far greater precision and control then before, it will be very valuable.”

The reality is that the vast bulk of the foods we consume whether organic or conventionally grown have had their genetics altered in the field or in a laboratory via a process of selective breeding or advanced biotechnology techniques, and all such foods are safe to eat. The altering of genes in plants is even known to occur naturally as highlighted by the sweet potato.

6 0
2 years ago
Which is made up of lipids?
damaskus [11]
Cell membrane i think as I remember
6 0
3 years ago
What two components are found as part of an enzyme?
ioda
Apoenzyme and a non-protein
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Carbon is found in glucose true or false
    9·1 answer
  • Biologist: Species with broad geographic ranges probably tend to endure longer than species with narrow ranges. The broader a sp
    11·1 answer
  • How is the mode of a data set defined
    13·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS THE LAST TWO QUESTIONS IVE ASKED THANK YOU (you also get a lot of points)
    14·2 answers
  • Cassandra made a Venn diagram to compare and contrast the two stages of cellular respiration.
    15·2 answers
  • What will a cold air mass do when it moves into a warm air mass
    6·1 answer
  • A person who eats a chicken
    12·1 answer
  • The digestive and excretory systems project explaining macromolecules in the body
    7·1 answer
  • An element has an atomic mass number of 16 and an atomic number of 7. How many protons and neutrons?
    13·1 answer
  • Humans should consider microbes as beneficial organisms for all of the following reasons except:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!