All categories

3 years ago

Thanks for the help!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Serhud [2]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

I. and II. are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

The line y=0 is a horizontal asymptote in both directions, so ...

$\lim\limits_{x\to -\infty}{f(x)}=\lim\limits_{x\to\infty}{f(x)}=0$

The function value f(0) is 0, so the limit is the same from either direction:

$\lim\limits_{x\to 0^-}{f(x)}=\lim\limits_{x\to 0^+}{f(x)}=0$

The expression for statement III can be simplified:

$\dfrac{f(x)-\dfrac{1}{2}}{x-1}=\dfrac{\dfrac{x}{1+x^2}-\dfrac{1}{2}}{x-1}=\dfrac{2x-(1+x^2)}{2(1+x^2)(x-1)}=\dfrac{-(x-1)^2}{2(x-1)(x^2+1)}\\\\=\dfrac{1-x}{2(x^2+1)}$

The limit of this is 0 from either direction, so the limit does exist at x=1.

_____

We consider that ...

both statements I. and II. are correct.

You might be interested in

What is the probability of the spinner stopping on an even number?

alisha [4.7K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I don’t understand how to proof Cpctc or answer the questions

n200080 [17]

I think that first you need to understand what CPCTC is used for.

Let's start with the definition of congruent triangles.

Definition of congruent triangles
Two triangles are congruent if each side of one triangle is congruent to a corresponding side of the other triangle and each angle of one triangle is congruent to a corresponding angle of the other triangle.

A definition works two ways.
1) If you are told the sides and angles of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides and angle of a second triangle, then you can conclude the triangles are congruent.
2) If you are told the triangles are congruent, then you can conclude 6 statements of congruence, 3 for sides and 3 for angles.

Now let's see what CPCTC is and how it works.
CPCTC stands for "corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent."
The way it works is this. You can prove triangles congruent by knowing fewer that 6 statements of congruence. You can use ASA, SAS, AAS, SSS, etc. Once you prove two triangles congruent, then by the definition of congruent triangles, there are 6 congruent statements. That is where CPCTC comes in. Once you prove the triangles congruent, then you can conclude two corresponding sides or two corresponding angles are congruent by CPCTC. These two corresponding parts were not involved in proving the triangles congruent.

Problem 1.

Statements Reasons
1. Seg. AD perp. seg. BC 1. Given
2. <ADB & <ADC are right angles 2. Def. of perp. lines
3. <ADB is congr. <ADC 3. All right angles are congruent
4. Seg. BD is congr. seg CD 4. Given
5. Seg. AD is congr. seg. AD 5. Congruence of segments is reflexive
6. Tr. ABD is congr. tr. ACD 6. SAS
7. Seg. AB is congr. seg. AC 7. CPCTC

4 0

3 years ago

Karley is an architect building the city pool. The larger rectangle represents the entire pool area. The smaller rectangle repre

Ahat [919]

Answer:

Area of the walkway border is 736 ft²

Step-by-step explanation:

A rectangle is a quadrilateral (has four sides and four angles) with two pairs of opposite and parallel sides. All angles in a rectangle are 90 degrees each. Also, opposite sides are equal.

The entire pool area has a length of 60 feet and width of 40 feet. The area of the entire pool area is:

Area of entire pool = length * width = 60 feet * 40 feet = 2400 ft²

The area of entire pool

A walkaway border of 4 ft is made around the pool area. There is a decrease of 4 ft round the sides of the pool area.

Therefore length of pool = length of entire pool area - 4 feet border at left - 4 feet border at right = 60 ft - 4 ft - 4 ft = 52 ft

width of pool = width of entire pool area - 4 feet border at top - 4 feet border at bottom = 40 ft - 4 ft - 4 ft = 32 ft

Therefore the pool is 52 ft × 32 ft

Area of pool = length * width = 52 ft * 32 ft = 1664 ft²

Area of the walkway border = Entire pool area - Area of pool = 2400 ft² - 1664 ft² = 736 ft²

8 0

3 years ago

Graph the system of equations. {8x+8y=642x−2y=−4

klemol [59]

The graph is attached.

Explanation:
We can use the x- and y-intercepts to graph. The x-intercept of the first equation is 8, and the y-intercept is 8. The x-intercept of the second equation is -2, and the y-intercept is 2.

x-intercepts are where the data crosses the x-axis. At every one of these points, the y-coordinate will be 0; therefore we can substitute 0 for y and solve to get the value of the x-intercept.

For the first equation, we would have
8x+8(0)=64
8x=64.

Divide both sides by 8:
8x/8 = 64/8
x=8.

For the second equation,
2x-2(0)=-4
2x=-4.

Divide both sides by 2:
2x/2 = -4/2
x=-2.

y-intercepts are where the data crosses the y-axis. At every one of these points, the x-coordinate will be 0; therefore we can substitute 0 for x and solve to get the value of the y-intercept.

For the first equation,
8(0)+8y=64
8y=64.

Divide both sides by 8:
8y/8 = 64/8
y=8.

For the second equation,
2(0)-2y=-4
-2y=-4.

Divide both sides by -2:
-2y/-2 = -4/-2
y=2.

Plot these points for both equations and connect them to draw the line.

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the distribution of typing speed in words per minute (wpm) for experienced typists using a new type of split keyboa

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

a. 0.5 or 50%

b. 0.496 or 49.6%

c. 0.8185 or 81.85%

d. Yes, it would be just 0.0013 or 0.13% of probability to find a typist whose speed exceeds 105 wpm

e. 0.0252 or 2.52%

f. The qualifying speed would be 47.4 wpm.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Let's find the z-score this way:

μ = 60 σ= 15

z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (60 - 60)/15

z-score = 0

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = 0, using the z-table:

p (z=0) = 0.5 or 50%

b. z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (59.9 - 60)/15

z-score = -0.01

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = -.0.01, using the z-table:

p (z = -0.01) = 0.496 or 49.6%

If the question were less or equal than 60, a and b would have the same answer. But in this case, the question is "less than 60 wpm".

z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (45 - 60)/15

z-score = - 1

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = -1, using the z-table:

p (z = -1) = 0.1587

z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (90 - 60)/15

z-score = 2

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = 2, using the z-table:

p (z = 2) = 0.9772

In consequence,

p (-1 ≤ z ≤ 2) = 0.9772 - 0.1587 = 0.8185 or 81.85%

d. z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (105 - 60)/15

z-score = 3

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = 3, using the z-table:

p (z = 3) = 0.9987

In consequence,

p (z > 3) = 1 - 0.9987 = 0.0013

Yes, it would be just a 0.13% of probability to find a typist whose speed exceeds 105 wpm.

e. z-score = (x - μ)/σ

z-score = (75 - 60)/15

z-score = 1

Now, let's calculate the p value for z-score = 1, using the z-table:

p (z = 1) = 0.8413

In consequence,

p (z > 1) = 1 - 0.8413 = 0.1587

and if the two typists are independently selected, then

p = 0.1587 * 0.1587

p = 0.0252 or 2.52%

f. p = 0.2, using the z-table, the z-score is -0.84, then:

z-score = (x - μ)/σ

-0.84 = (x - 60)/15

-12.6 = x - 60

-x = -60 + 12.6

-x = - 47.4

x = 47.4

The qualifying speed would be 47.4 wpm.

8 0

3 years ago

Thanks for the help!​

Thanks for the help!