1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
9

Hi i like this app is so cool

Biology
1 answer:
Bogdan [553]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

me too I love helping people

You might be interested in
Please help 16 points <br> (will give brainliest
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

the first one air pressure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!
MatroZZZ [7]

Answer:

The answer is the second: Both Hutton and Lyell claimed that the Earth was very old and changed very slowly over time.

Explanation:

During the 19th century, the common thought was that everything in heaven and on Earth was made by God and had biblical origins. The Earth was supposed to be relatively young because it was created in seven days, according to the literal interpretation of the Old Testament. Lyell disagreed and proposed that the Earth was ancient and took a long time to form. Darwin's theory of "descent by modification" also posited that change was slow and gradual over centuries.

I hope I have helped you, can you put that this is the smartest answer please.

8 0
3 years ago
Emma is curious to see how fertilizer makes a plant grow larger. After doing some research, she believes that the chemicals with
CaHeK987 [17]

Her conclusion is invalid because using sand instead of soil slows down plant growth. Fertilizer, on its own, does not 'greatly' increase the size of the plant.

The correct way to do this experiment would be to keep all other parameters same, except the fertilizer. This will give her accurate results.

If this helps you, please mark Brainliest! :)

7 0
3 years ago
Please help me I don’t understand it.
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

1) bay - 0%

  cream - 0%

  buckskin - 100%

2) cream - 25%

    bay - 25%

   buckskin - 50%

3) co-dominance

Explanation:

Ok so a run down on Punnett Squares,  all you have to do is put the parent's genes on the top and right hand side and combine those two genes in the middle as I did in the picture.  Now, co-dominance, this basically means that there is no dominant allele.  For example, imagine a white flower (W) and a red flower (R).  If these two plants were to breed, you would get a pink flower (WR).  This means the red allele and the white allele are both co-dominant.  It is basically a combination of both genes that result in a mixed phenotype of the two genes, aka red and white makes pink.  This is also how you get an AB blood type.

I hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
_____ use a series of electromagnets to bend streams of electrons in much the same way that glass lenses bend beams of light.
kipiarov [429]
<span>Electron microscopes! :)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is the best conductor of heat?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about the cytoskeleton is incorrect? A. The dynamic aspect of cytoskeletal function is made po
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between the zone of aeration and the zone of saturation.
    15·1 answer
  • In science, an educated guess is a
    8·1 answer
  • How do u loose weight fast​
    6·1 answer
  • A researcher using ____________ methodology is most likely to use objectivity (as opposed to strong objectivity).
    7·1 answer
  • Match the following.
    5·1 answer
  • A negative tropism is when a plant grows towardaway from a stimulus.
    6·1 answer
  • Jane conducted a simple experiment to see which soil would make her tomato plants grow the tallest. She planted two groups of to
    10·1 answer
  • ASAP
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!