It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
<em>The “New South” boosters argued that with its plantation economy destroyed by the Civil War and Reconstruction, that the South would develop a new economy more attuned to the industrial capitalism that defined the rest of the American economy.</em>
<u>Henry affected the South's economy during the Reconstruction period when he used his office and influence to promote a New South program of northern investment, southern industrial growth, diversified farming, and white supremacy.</u>
Answer:
es importante destacar la diferencia entre los. ... de recibir un ascenso, principalmente debido a que el ascenso no es una “libertad civil” garantizada.
Answer:
Cytoplasm and Golgi Bodies
Explanation:
Answer:
her lips might be bluish in color
Explanation: