The angle relationship and their reasons are:
- m∠HED = m∠FEJ ---> Vertical angles theorem
- m∠KFE = m∠DEH ---> Alternate interior angles theorem
- m∠LFG = m∠DEH ---> Alternate exterior angles theorem
- m∠JEF + m∠LFE = 180° ---> same-side interior angles theorem
- m∠DEJ = m∠EFL ---> Corresponding interior angles theorem
- m∠LFG + m∠GFK = 180 ---> linear pair
The angle pairs are formed based on their relative positions. The following shows each angle relationship and their reasons:
∠HED and ∠FEJ are directly vertically opposite each other, therefore, they are equal based on the vertical angles theorem.
- m∠HED = m∠FEJ ---> Vertical angles theorem
∠KFE and ∠FEJ are alternate interior angles, therefore, they are equal based on the alternate interior angles theorem.
- m∠KFE = m∠DEH ---> Alternate interior angles theorem
∠LFG and ∠FEJ are alternate exterior angles, therefore, they are equal based on the alternate exterior angles theorem.
- m∠LFG = m∠DEH ---> Alternate exterior angles theorem
∠JEF and ∠LFE are interior angles on same side of the transversal, therefore, the sum of both angles equal 180 degrees based on the same-side interior angles theorem.
- m∠JEF + m∠LFE = 180° ---> same-side interior angles theorem
∠DEJ and ∠EFL are corresponding angles, therefore, they are equal based on the corresponding angles theorem.
- m∠DEJ = m∠EFL ---> Corresponding interior angles theorem
∠LFG and ∠GFK are angles on a straight line, therefore the sum of both angles will equal 180 degrees because they are a linear pair.
- m∠LFG + m∠GFK = 180 ---> linear pair
Learn more about angle relationship on:
brainly.com/question/12591450
The value of 7 in 26..74 is 0.7
The value of 7 in 37.596 is 7.
1/10 the value of 7 in 26.74 is 0.07 and 0.07 ≠ 7.
So, statement a) is incorrect.
1/100 the value of 7 in 26.74 is 0.007 and 0.007 ≠ 7.
So, statement c) is incorrect.
100 times the value of 7 in 26.74 is 70 and 70 ≠ 7.
So, statement d) is incorrect.
10 times the value of 7 in 26.74 is 7 and 7 = 7.
So, statement b) is correct and it correctly compares two values.
Y = total amount of money spent
x = cost of one drink
So our expression is:
4x + 12.75
4x stands for 4 drinks times x price of one drink
The 12.75 is a one time fee for the pizza, since Kiyo isn't buying multiple pizzas.
The problem also asks us to find the total price, so we write an equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0f55/d0f552741a57c48350f5aa6c6303674a7bfac797" alt="y = 4x + 12.75"
We insert what x is which in this case is $3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7d76/a7d7601c6adf3e9edc4e8453454af8d0dd1596bd" alt="y = 4(3) + 12.75"
Order of Operations tells us to multiply first:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0411/d041112d8002f67c27d1d0fc42d0f4fc714fc126" alt="y = 12 + 12.75"
Now add your values:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aade4/aade432f2b42a75820fcac25042aad8ee4d9111c" alt="y = 24.75"
Therefore, Kiyo spent a total amount of 24.75 at Paola's pizza.
Let's check our problem just in case:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ffed/0ffede7ea7617fd973fd4d6e4d51253b7eed8dd2" alt="24.75 = 4x + 12.75"
Since we now know what y is equal to, we can plug that into our original equation and check just to verify
We should subtract 12. on both sides of the equation because of inverse operations:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12154/12154c28cdaeab9d040ec26b27a62880d57097ea" alt="24.75 - 12.75 = 12.75 - 12.75 + 4x"
We are left with:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eafb2/eafb2badd838c981cfff4a196d01b807ea56f5c7" alt="12 = 4x"
We divide:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a58/06a58f387fb10fe1bee12ecbdeb73c90dad78677" alt="\frac{12}{4} = \frac{4x}{4}"
Our result is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce170/ce170e03468380ee011d0acd577f7440d6b6393a" alt="3 = x"
Which checks out because each drink was in fact, $3 dollars as stated in the word problem. Hope that was thorough enough.
Round about...90 feet per second