Answer:
bias is leaning toward a certain perspective for certain reasons other than logic like your own opinion. for example, a news reporter could report negatively about something because he/she is against it even tho it benefits the majority
Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
Explanation:
NOTE: In order to solve this question efficiently, there is need to watch the videos attached to this question. Kindly check video link in the comment section of this question since it can not be attached here. If the link can not be added in the comment section, check the Channel(TED), the title is AM I NOT HUMAN? A CALL FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM.
So, from the video one can see that the presenter in the TED talk made use of Pathos more than he does for logos.
The argument/point in this presentation that I find the most compelling is when he argued that people that have bad past also deserves an empathy and not only people with no criminal record as we are all human and we can do better. The past is in the past and the present is the present.
Answer:
4.53%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Expected return = ∑ (Return × probability)
Thus,
Expected return = (0.06 × 22) + (0.92 × 13) + (0.02 × (-15))
= 12.98%
Now,
Probability Return Probability × (Return-Expected Return)²
0.06 22 0.06 × (22% - 12.98%)² = 4.8816
0.92 13 0.92 × (13% - 12.98%)² = 0.000368
0.02 -15 0.02 × (-15% - 12.98%)² = 5.657608
========================================================
Total = 20.5396%
Standard deviation = 
= √(20.5396)
= 4.53%
Answer:
Dr cash $375,000
Cr unearned revenue $375,000
Dr unearned revenue $37,500
Cr revenue $37,500
Explanation:
The total amount realized from the sale of tickets is $375,000($250*1500)
However,the cash proceeds should be debited to cash while it is also credited to unearned revenue
The revenue from fulfilling the performance obligation=1/10*$375,000=$37,500
The $37,500 is debited to unearned revenue and credited to sales revenue as that amount has now been earned
