Yes, i believe so because u can count back twice and u will get 5. You could al so do: 7-2=5. Hope this helps
Answer:
232.045
Step-by-step explanation:
217 + 253 + 214 + 247 + 217 + 253 + 232 + 246 + 223 + 227 + 229 + 247 + 206 + 241 + 239 + 223 + 222 + 216 + 252 + 209 + 236 + 256 = 5105
5105 / 22 = 232.045454545
Step-by-step explanation:
(4²-x²)³/²
or,(4+X) (4-X)
Answer:
Transitive property of equality is not a justification for the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
We draw a right angle ΔACB. CD is perpendicular to AB.
Let AC = a , BC = b , AB = c and CD = h
Now in ΔABC and ΔACD
∠C = ∠D and ∠A = ∠A
from AA similarity postulate
ΔABC similar to ΔACD.
Hence,
= 
= c × x ·····················(1)
Now in ΔABC and ΔCBD
∠C = ∠D and ∠B = ∠B
from AA similarity postulates
ΔABC similar to ΔCBD
Hence,

= c × y······················(2)
Add equation (1) and (2)
+
= cx + cy
+
= c(x+y)
+
=
[because x+y=c]
Transitive property is not useful for this proof.