I’m just trying to help so hopefully this did help;-)
If I recall correctly from my World History days, then it is D.
Answer:
The largest disagreement perhaps amongst the framers was the issue of state representation. This issue could not be solved quickly as the creation of a checks and balances system had been. The framers soon found that the larger state delegates wanted to use population numbers to decide how many people would be chosen as delegates for Congress.
Explanation:
Judges are appointed, not elected, because the framers did not want them to focus on outside factors like getting elected.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
