1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bogdanovich [222]
3 years ago
11

Social darwinists believe that?

History
2 answers:
jeka943 years ago
8 0

That evolution takes place by the principle Natural Selection Basically the strongest survive and reproduce

vfiekz [6]3 years ago
5 0
Social Darwinism is the belief that one race is superior to others through false ‘scientific’ fact. For example: the idea that Caucasian is superior to African-Americans because their skull is shaped different. (Which isn’t true, but it’s what was believed during the time period social Darwinism came to be)
You might be interested in
Was feudalism a beneficial way of organizing society to keep order during the Middle Ages or was it an oppressive government sys
Maurinko [17]
Feudalism was an oppressive government system; once you were born into a class, you stayed there. There was very little social mobility, so it’s quite apparent to see why only the royals and nobles would benefit from such.
7 0
3 years ago
The quotient of twice a number and 25
Elza [17]
2x(25) = quotient

hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! Willing To Type Short Response To This
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

The leaders of the American Revolution made three great gambles. First, they sought independence from the powerful British Empire, becoming the first colonies in the Americas to revolt and seek independence from their mother empire. Second, they formed a union of thirteen states, which was also unprecedented, for the colonies had long histories of bickering with one another. Third, the revolutionaries committed their new states to a republic, then a radical and risky form of government. In a republic, the people were the sovereign—rejecting the rule of a monarch and aristocrats. Today we take for granted that governments elected by the people can be stable, long lasting, and effective. But the Americans in the new nation were not so sure, given the lessons of history. In 1789, the United States was the only large republic in the world; the others were a handful of small city-states scattered in Europe, and none of the larger republics in the history of the world had lasted very long. Like the ancient republic of Rome, they had collapsed and reverted to some form of tyranny, usually by a military dictator.

Any one of those three gambles was an enormous risk. The miracle was that the revolutionaries pulled off all three of them, winning their war against the British, and securing a generous boundary in the peace treaty of 1783: west to the Mississippi, south to Florida, and north to the Great Lakes, with the Atlantic Ocean as the eastern boundary.

During the mid-1780s, however, the new nation seemed about to collapse as quickly as it had been created. The first constitution of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781. It proved too weak to control the powerful state governments. Unable directly to tax people, the confederation lacked its own revenue and could not afford an army or a navy, or even to pay the interest on its massive war debt. American Indians defied the confederation, and the Europeans insisted that no republic could endure on such a big geographic scale.

Plus the states were roiled by social conflicts between the wealthy gentlemen and the common people over issues of credit or debit. Gentlemen faulted the state governments for pandering to common voters by offering to relieve debtors at the expense of their creditors, those gentlemen who had loaned them money and goods. The gentlemen concluded that the state governments were too democratic, which meant too responsive to public opinion. And when a rare state government did favor the creditors, it provoked resistance from armed farmers.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which group gained the most as a result of the Latin American revolutions?
rewona [7]

Answer:

The Patriots were the obvious winners in the Revolution; they gained independence, the right to practice representative government, and several new civil liberties and freedoms. Loyalists, or Tories, were the losers of the Revolution; they supported the Crown, and the Crown was defeated.

3 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help me​
elixir [45]

Answer:

B. The Senate

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List the 3 inalienable rights of the Declaration of Independence ?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE REPLY QUICK !!
    7·1 answer
  • The "necessary and proper clause" is a phrase in the U.S. Constitution designed to protect the principle of
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why mills, such as that established by Samuel Slater, were built along rivers?
    7·2 answers
  • True or False: The Northwest Odrinance banned slavery in the region.
    11·1 answer
  • The biggest issue between the papacy and the monarchy of Western Rome was _____.
    10·1 answer
  • A standing committee is defined as _______________________.
    6·1 answer
  • PLS helppp me!!!!!!! So i can bring my grades up!!!!!!!! what did Albert Einstein invent
    7·2 answers
  • 4. What actions did the Catholics in Ireland take against the Protestants during the
    5·1 answer
  • How does war affect unemployment?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!