Answer:
Yellow journalism and the yellow press are American terms for journalism and associated newspapers that present little or no legitimate well-researched news while instead using eye-catching headlines for increased sales. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism.
Explanation:
Political trends regarding the level of government involvement in social issues are reflected by the success of conservative or liberal perspectives in political parties, in the sense of favoring greater or lesser government involvement in social issues.
The liberal perspective favors greater government regulation in the marketplace and less government involvement in personal privacy issues. Liberalism is only in favor of government intervention of private property rights and freedom.
On the other hand, from the conservative perspective, there is a favoring of lesser government protectionism in the market, private property and trade.
Regarding social issues, the conservative ideology favors the government to be less involved in decisions so that greater social and economic equality is achieved.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/2261035
Answer:
Examples of Human Adaptation
Diets are an example of human adaptation because the food available depends on the geographical area where humans live.
For example, the Inuit eat a lot of seal and fish because those are the most abundant sources of food in the artic, while the Mediterranean diet is abundant in fruits and vegetables because the climate of the Mediterranean is warm, and many crops grow there.
Examples of Human Modification
Aqueducts are a form of human modification. They are physical structures used to carry water from one place to another, and they can be built above ground or underground. The Romans were famous builders of acqueducts.
Examples of both
Wells are like a rudimentary aqueduct. They are digged in the ground to obtain water from underground sources, and represent both a human adaptation and modification at the same time.
Answer:
sixteen is the right answer
Explanation:
:) also i took the test b4 i answered this question and got it wrong it said this is the correct answer
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
